|
MAIN MENU |
ASPIE UNFRIENDLY - FORESAM (SECOND SECTION) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article - contrary to another opinion - is NOT a comedy piece. It is DEADLY serious, and the truth. A few distractions - including a house move - meant that this important part of the battle for respect against Aspie Enemies was left alone for awhile, and then the collapse of a datastick cost me a great deal of data - forcing the creation of this second section on Aspie's greatest enemy in human form; Fore Sam. Since the last update plenty has happened. The biggest news is that many threads on his blog have been deleted. Delightfully that included all the threads with my full name in the title - putting an end to my legal preparations against him. The Autism Fraud blog specifically for Amanda Baggs was also removed for a time (it's now back though unfortunately), and a lot of his other pieces of garbage are also gone. The catalyst of this mass deletion is one man. Yes, one man - Judge Stuart Berger. In early January 2008, Fore Sam lost it when he read that Judge Berger had rejected the "expert testimony" of the Geiers in a vaccine injury case - supporting the majority knowledge that Autism is genetic in origin. The Maryland District Court Judge put on the record a view that unless countered by a superior court will create a legal precedent that puts a rather large spanner in the works of the case that Fore Sam has constantly preached. And he flipped. He published a post on his blog titled "Dishonorable Stuart R Berger, Moron or Bought?" and tried to tell as many people as possible to act against this person - and the second action had major repercussions for his list of allies. His biggest one was the "Evidence of Harm" group on Yahoo, run by Lenny Schafer. And Lenny (bless him) ran Fore Sam out of the group. This is proof that Fore Sam not only doesn't care who he offends, it is further evidence of his Spectrum traits. He came back to his blog and let fly at Schafer as well. He also lost his status as a Generation Rescue "Angel". The post about Judge Berger is still there, but the rants at Schafer disappeared at the same time as the rest I mentioned above. I heard a rumour that he'd received a visit from child services but there isn't anything around to confirm it. Since the meltdown - it has been a rare event for objecting comments to be allowed through. I have seven here, five that were intended for posts that have now been deleted. Here they are in reverse chronological order; The first one was from one of the rants at Lenny Schafer titled "Lenny Schafer Surrenders to Big Pharma", where someone called Elizabeth tried to calm Fore Sam down (as if that was going to work, Liz!).
Backbone? You haven't got a
backbone at all, Best! More and more people are turning on you, and you
just haven't got the guts to admit that maybe.. MAYBE.. you are wrong!
Admitting that you are wrong takes the backbone you claim to have. So
let's have it! If you won't admit you are wrong you don't have any
backbone. Even those who you thought were on your side are seeing your
meglomania. Elizabeth (for the most part) talked a lot of sense. (I knew
it! The SIXTH post Best refused to post from me! So here we go
again!) The second responded to Rossco's claim that some anonymous poster was me, and I also quoted links to prove - on the way that is - that the chromosomes that may carry the secret to the true origin of ASD's are being narrowed down. The title of this departed post was "Autism Diva (Camille Clark) Rumor".
Paranoid, Lumbus? No, it was not
me. I've been too busy annoying Best in another way. Such as;
hmg.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/ddm376v1.pdf
www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Autism/dh/7917 (Broken up to fit). Read
them and weep, (deleted)! The genetic truth is closer to being proven. As
it should be - and the mercury poisoning rubbish will sink into the same
mire as the flat earthers! (Oh here we go - that's four posts now that
Best is scared of! First amendment, mouse!) The third responded to a simple barb at the Diva about running away and telling Wrong Planet member Beau that he knew best (HAH!). This was part of the post titled "Pure Evil, Neurodiversity and Autism Speaks". Oh no Diva wouldn't run away,
(deleted)! She'd slap you so hard your ears would bleed! And I agree with
Beau - you do NOT know what's best for us. You are an irresponsible
parent, and deep down you know it! The worst part about it is you don't
even know you're lying. More's the pity and it's a shame it's going to
take nothing less than losing your son to prove it. Ah the itchy mod
finger makes it FIVE posts you're scared of! The fourth - which I put on Flardox's blog under his "Posts that Fore Sam wouldn't allow" thread - was in response to Fore Sam's constant claim that Kevin Leitch abused Autistic children on his blog, as well as a claim that someone called "Whistleblower" was in fact Kevin when it wasn't. The IP issue (I don't know how Fore Sam got that info) was sorted by someone else as I noted. The title of this thread was "Pictures of Sam". Oh once again - the stupidity
of (deleted) is to the fore! (Pun intended!) Maxima gets a stamp of
approval for dealing with the IP issue, but..... Of course those three postings were amongst the ones deleted. The fifth was in reply to Fore Sam calling me a psycho when he first modded this out. The first part addresses that before I went ahead and blasted Harold Doherty for his inconsistency - and this includes a quote which I have marked "Anonymous" just to save time. The title of this thread was "Openings at JRC Waiting for Neuronitwits". I showed you and Doherty up,
Best! That's why you modded me out! I scare the crap out of you and you
are desperate to make me look like a fool. Sorry - won't work! If anyone
is psychotic it's you. The last three words were added because Fore Sam posted this on Flardox's blog - and Flardox removed it at my request. I did have an eighth post being modded out, but that newer thread was also removed. Small wonder when you consider the title - "Help Save Megan, Donations Accepted" (the filthy replacement for the earlier threads). I said - in response to the following from Fore Sam; Advising
brain damaged people to repair their brains is not disrespectful. It's
sane advice. I added the last remark when someone else suggested I had kids when in fact that was another Phil. The other two posts go to existing threads. The oldest is for the thread "Amanda Baggs, LSD Psychosis or Autism?" where an anon rejected the Lucky Phil Lewis character as total fantasy. I'm not putting that posting here because I am persisting in putting it on Fore Sam's blog. He threatened to sue me if I kept it up - but that threat has been removed interestingly! The second one is for "Playing Poker with the Enemy". Both threads have been deleted as well and the posts have been lost. So now we restart with the quotes. A new era, but same old stupidity. Fore Sam
Quotes (General) Like he would know that! Typical - claims all the knowledge in the world, and sets himself for a massive fall (this comment was in reference to a New Hampshire state government employed scientist who said that there were no vaccines in New Hampshire that contained mercury). Injecting
mercury into them means that mercury is going to wind up in the fetus. Again - he doesn't know that. Where are your qualifications, idiot? It seems
those responsible for the health of citizens of NH don't know, don't care
and don't want to know since they will not take the time to study this and
the effect it has already had on our children. The studies have already been done, Fore Sam! Stop crying - and stop lying! Accept the truth, that mercury has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with Autism. The largest
rise in autism happened in conjunction with the HepB vaccine being given
to infants as soon as they were born. Prior to that, New Hampshire did not
have even one case of autism among school age children. The short answer to that is YES THERE WAS! They were undiagnosed, but they were there! The HepB vaccine made no difference to that fact. The reason
the HepB shot was so effective at causing autism is because newborn
infants do not have a Blood Brain Barrier that helps prevent some of that
mercury from getting to the brain. If that was true then every single baby would be Autistic, and we know that isn't the case! Injecting
pregnant women can have a more disastrous effect in causing more autism
since the fetus can be much smaller than a newborn infant and have their
brain destroyed before they are born by the mercury that was injected into
the mother. IDIOT! If the brain was destroyed, the child would be born brain dead! Which again we know isn't the case! We do not
need more babies poisoned because incompetent and ignorant jackasses
decide to avoid looking into important issues like thimerosal. I think it would be more useful to decide that what we really do not need is bogus paranoid scaremongering like this, and it needs to be reeled in. It seems
Judd Gregg has passed down his protection scheme for Pharma to the lower
ranking elected dirtbags. It seems that Fore Sam's government conspiracy theories know no bounds. And yet he won't run for public office to try and do something about it as he once said he would - the coward! And instead of going for the Presidency (which was dumb and as we know got him an Idiot of the Month award in 2007 here - and within one vote of Idiot of the Year) he should be working his way up through the ranks. There was a break in postings before he began again at the beginning of March. Amanda Baggs
has found another victim to help her spread misinformation about
autism. Oh boo hoo! You mean Amanda has found another person who is not tainted by the lies of Fore Sam, Daniel Drucker and Ophelia! I wrote to
the author of this nonsense, Tara Parker-Pope but she has not replied. Of course she didn't! She knew a moron when she saw one! Good for her! I also
commented on the NY Times site but they did not decide to publish the
truth, that Amanda Baggs is not, and has never been autistic. They publish the truth. You - Fore Sam - don't tell the truth. Neuroinsanity exists for the sole purpose of bashing
anyone who has anything to do with curing autism. NeuroDIVERSITY exists as a medical fact. To refer to it as "insane" is the same as calling a person with dark skin a "nigger". Sickening and indefensible. The
preferred method of attack by this band of psychopaths is character
assassination. And you don't do that, Fore Sam? You hypocrite! The fact of
the matter is that chelation has been used since the 1940's and is
standard practice in mainstream medicine for cases of mercury
poisoning. Of course. But what this idiot won't accept is that we aren't dealing with mercury poisoning! If this
bunch of sadists can use Amanda Baggs to spread their deranged message,
they can influence parents to forego treatments that will help their
children. Rubbish! What Amanda represents is what can happen when one isn't properly diagnosed, and what can happen with the RIGHT sort of support. Amanda has benefitted from this, and that gets into Fore Sam's craw because deep down he knows that if he hadn't neglected his own son he'd have a son who has the things Amanda has. They can
also influence the general public through the NY Times and CNN into
believing that autism is no big deal, that people like Amanda Baggs, who
acts like a low functioning autistic person can get along in life with a
minimum of support. Autism IS a big deal - just not a big a deal as what Fore Sam is trying to promote it as (100 percent negative with no redeeming factor whatsoever - which is complete and utter crap). Anything that downplays anything that Fore Sam is playing up inappropriately also upsets the man who is old enough to know better than to carry on like a teenage drama queen! The truth of
the matter is that children who act like Amanda Baggs will never improve
without intense medical intervention. Again - rubbish! Of course children can improve without the sort of intervention Fore Sam is crapping on about! That's what he doesn't get - and again, it upsets him because he didn't pursue this himself. They will
remain unable to communicate for the rest of their lives, will never be
able to care for themselves and will require 24 hour a day care in an
institution once they become too large for their parents to handle. The only children who end up like that are the ones who have been neglected. Like your son, Fore Sam! And you only have yourself to blame. And even then - there is still a chance of a level of functioning that can work. The Autistic person simply wants that to happen, and they always did. Just not a "normal" functioning level because they can sense they are out of place. The key to it all is to show that being like that is not all bad. But Fore Sam won't allow that - and he is therefore INCREASING the suffering!! By confusing
the distinction between Asperger's and autism, Neuroinsanity and Amanda
Baggs can deflect blame from the Pharmaceutical industry. Fore Sam continues to refuse to accept that the Autistic Spectrum is one thing at it's root. It's a medical fact. Ask yourself
if you'd label yourself as a severely disabled person who can't even wipe
your butt versus a college educated professional if you were applying for
a job. Pfft! Ask yourself if those two would apply for the same sort of job! Of course not!! A straw man argument if ever there was one! That's what
these adults, who claim to have Asperger's do when they refer to
themselves as autistic. It just does not make sense. Of course it doesn't make sense because that remark is completely wrong. One would
think they'd want to make sure they marked themselves with a wide
distinction from the horrible nightmare that autism is. The medical diagnosis of anything on the Spectrum eliminates any chance of the distinction, and besides - Aspies have the same routine and autonomy needs as LFA's do. Just the gravity of the need is different. Who would
ever consider hiring an autistic person for any job when they would have
to have at least two other employees to care for them and, of course, the
autistic person could never accomplish one single task in any form of
employment? See, now THAT is completely wrong! ANYBODY can do something - it's just a question of what. So you find it. Fore Sam wouldn't bother, which makes him a bigoted piece of cow manure. That's what
autism is, a condition in which no person will ever accomplish anything
and will never be able to communicate anything but the most basic of
needs, if that. Fore Sam takes that view because he has given up on his son. Disgusting and pathetic. A change of attitude would do him a world of good. With rare
exceptions, it would be absolutely impossible to teach an autistic child
to type coherent thoughts without treating the cause of the condition so
their brain could function at something approaching normalcy. No it would not be, Fore Sam. Unless there are additional problems on top of Autism and have nothing to do with Autism. Your son for example has been taught through seven years of neglect to accept extreme pain - hence his biting episodes. And likely some actual brain damage. That isn't Autism. That's Fore Sam's neglect, and he should lose his son for that. The only
reason Amanda Baggs can type coherent thoughts at 120 words per minute and
make her own Youtube videos is beacuse she is a phoney. Wrong! It's because she has learnt how to do this stuff despite all the hold backs - proving that it CAN be done! That's what upsets Fore Sam above all else. Amanda wanted to communicate, and she found a way she could cope with and exploited that skill for all it was worth. It's called making up for what she can't do - just like a blind person's hearing sharpens to make up for the lack of sight. Tara
Parker-Pope needs to meet a real autistic person some day. I'd love her to
spend a day with my son so she could appreciate the full horror that
autism is. Like everyone else who has seen him in action - either directly on his blog, or indirectly on articles like this one - Tara knows that she would be getting involved with a mad man if she communicated with Fore Sam. Why do you think Sam hasn't got any publicity? Because of his father - the psycho who won't listen to reason and denies his Aspieness. While
Neuroinsanity claims to be about gaining acceptance, services and respect
for autistic people, that is just a front for its' true purpose of making
parents think that some sane people would actually oppose curing
autism. The two go together, because pursuing a cure for what is a genetic condition at it's root is what is insane. Neuroinsanity is like agents who are sent undercover
to disrupt an organization by causing conflict from within. Any
intelligent person who studies their actions realizes this. Any truly intelligent person would see that the real problem is the organisation in question. This idiot
claims that studies have looked at kids who've been vaccinated versus kids
who have not been vaccinated to determine if vaccines cause autism. They certainly have, and it's ongoing which is why there's no report. (The "idiot" by the way is ABC America medical expert Dr. Tim Johnson) A CDC
employee gave us the proof that the thimerosal in vaccines caused an
autism epidemic in 1999. Which was based on a false premise and not supported by the CDC at all - and nor should it have been. Your
stupidity or your lies (take your pick) will cause a lifetime of the most
horrendous human suffering I can imagine for countless children and their
families. Autism does not equal the suffering of malnutrition and the multitude of diseases suffered in places like Africa and impoverished Asia. Fore Sam is showing his bias again. Autism is
the worst thing that can possibly happen to any human being. Death is worse as is what I said above. You could
find out if you are affected by mercury with a hair test and, if so, you
might gain improvement in your symptoms by getting that mercury out of
your head. I now have it on good authority that the hair test is garbage and completely unreliable. On March 4, 2008, Fore Sam tried to grab a quote from Kevin Leitch and take it right out of context! Typical! Something is
very wrong here. When we are barred from hearing all sides, we never get
the whole truth Fore Sam took this as an admission of guilt that the whole truth (in Fore Sam's eyes) was being with held - when in fact Kevin was addressing the comment to the mercury militia's favourite fountain of misinformation (well, one of them) - David Kirby! He had a whine based on that regarding the lack of ability to comment on other blogs (including mine at Big Blog) using this comment as evidence. It's just
amazing that these media giants keep ignoring the truth about Baggs. I
guess all I can do is to keep writing about it. As if that's going to make any difference, psycho! The Poling
case I can't
remember what mitochondria are but I'm guessing they're very small things
that could be affected by mercury. Whether or not this is the case has nothing to do with Autism. Finally, a
major network has allowed a doctor to state on TV that vaccines cause
autism. They even let Dr Poling discuss the role of thimerosal as a factor
in causing autism. I believe he said that the thimerosal can have an
effect on the mitochondria. Wow!! It's hard to believe we have finally
seen this in this media. Poling - the Dad of the girl concerned. Like he'd be a neutral party - that's like letting Fore Sam talk about his son and be neutral! Yeah right! They allowed it for the sensation value and nothing more. And maybe to help him look like a fool. I don't
think Sanjay will be allowed to continue to lie to the public much longer.
I think Gupta will have to be fired pretty soon. He has now become an
embarrassment. You wish, Fore Sam! All those
parents of autistic kids who were lied to by their pediatricians, who
still claim thimerosal does not cause autism, heard the truth from a
Neurologist who had his own child poisoned by vaccines. See what I said above! Now that the
truth came from an MD, all those parents who have believed the lies from
our corrupt government should be deluging their Senators with demands for
proper action. All of the liars in Congress now have to face the truth and
stop defending their corrupt and negligent friends in the vaccine
industry. And the proper action is to get the doctors to apply vaccines properly - do it one by one and not in a bunch, and not when the child is ill! Nothing whatsoever to do with Autism or thiomersal! And start charging doctors with neglect when they don't do it (and I think the Poling's have that sort of case against the doctor who gave Hannah five on the trot!). Neuroinsanity sustained a fatal blow today in
Atlanta. Nope - NeuroDIVERSITY suffered no such blow. Now that the
government knows they can't lie to us anymore (although they're still
trying) they will have to do the right thing. They are doing the right thing already, Fore Sam. Dismissing the Poling case as an isolated thing that has nothing to do with Autism. You won't let them tell the truth because of your bias! They'll
rescue all the victims from the Cult of Neuroinsanity No rescue required - except for poor Sam! Gerberding
has stood by and done everything in her power to allow the Pharmaceutical
industry to poison more babies into autism. This was in response to Julie - a spokesperson for the Centre for Disease Control - stating that the Poling decision was NOT an admission that mercury causes Autism. And Fore Sam continued his tirade; She came out
with some idiotic statement yesterday claiming that it has not been proven
that any vaccines have caused autism. This is obvious spin control to
protect Pharma that will allow more children to be poisoned into the
nightmarish abyss of autism. No, it's a statement of medical fact. That's
enough, Julie!! We're sick of your damn lies. We've known that thimerosal
causes autism for 9 long years while Gerberding has sat there and
continued to deny this fact. That's enough, Fore Sam! We're sick of YOUR lies! We've known for decades that Autism is genetic in origin, and for the last nine years idiots have been erroneously claiming otherwise! Now that a
court case conceded that vaccines caused the autism, one would think this
bitch, who is supposed to be looking out for our health, would admit that
she has screwed up for the last 9 years and do the right thing. Nope,
she's going to keep trying to "spin" the simple facts. Again - this case does NOT prove any such thing. It was only an admission that five vaccines in rapid succession affected a condition not related to Autism and produced symptoms that resembled Autism! Hannah does NOT have a diagnosis of Autism to my knowledge. Too many
people now know that you intentionally allowed the vaccine industry to
poison our children. It's time to make all of the vaccines safe, right
now, today. No more thimerosal. We know the truth!!! STOP POISONIONG OUR
BABIES!!! I call that first sentence slander to be honest. Fore Sam wouldn't know the truth if he fell over it. More
histrionics This was at the end of a message again whining about Amanda Baggs after quoting an observation from Daniel Drucker (a known liar about Amanda) claiming that Amanda's lawyer admitted to him that Amanda wasn't Autistic and to just leave her alone. I think lying about a conversation with a lawyer is a rather more obvious and serious offence! There are no
people opposed to curing autism. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Now THERE is a classic Fore Sam quote if ever I've seen one! What a brilliant example of Fore Sam's lack of rationality! Blogger put
some kind of code on my blog so that search engines wouldn't find it. I
straightened that out with Blogger and they removed the code. More likely he lied to Blogger. It's a shame I can't do anything about that. Then they
tried to have my Autism Fraud blog booted by telling Blogger it was a spam
blog. I straightned that out too. See what I said above. More lies - it is a spam blog without a doubt, and slanderous on top of that. Not that Blooger or Google care! I guess this means the psycho is back! Oh boy. Wikipedia Get Dumb is
right. He must be reading Wrong Planet, because the subject was indeed
mentioned that User:Bettwice33 was playing a woman on a forum (it was
Autism Speaks by the way) and further even used it to threaten someone
privately. I myself have been the victim of this man's erratic and
psychotic behaviour. It is not beyond reason that User:Appto is a sock
puppet of User:Bettwice33. He has been irrationally unhinged by the
publicity Amanda has received because he is convinced that she is not
Autistic. His so called "million sources" do not exist beyond information
from two people who claim to know her and do not. User:Bettwice33 is
trying to involve WP in his personal war against Autistic Spectrum
Disorders - all because he has been driven to meglomania by the fact that
his son is Autistic and he can't handle it. Banning him is the best course
of action against this person, and his IP should be blocked as well if it
hasn't already. Meanwhile, Fore Sam (predictably) roared back to his precious blog and chucked his usual tantrums. Note how the
editor here references blogs and forums as hearsay and not acceptable when
one wants to expose the fraud of Amanda baggs and Neurodiversity. At the
same time, these jackasses defend Amanda Baggs' right to have her
fraudulent blog posted as though it was a respectable reference.
Nonsense. Blogs are perfectly acceptable if the subject is proven to be notable. Notability isn't proven by a blog by itself - even Amanda's. What got her over the line was the CNN coverage. If Fore Sam had an article on Wikipedia (and he doesn't because one can't prove notability under Wikipedia rules) his blog would be okay because it would have had third party coverage. These rules work better for individuals than companies - as I have found out the hard way. Wikipedia
consistently allows Neurodiverse nitwits to say anything they want on
their inane excuse for an encyclopedia. They also consistently delete
everything that points out the deranged nature of Neurodiversity and
fraudulent autistic people like Amanda Baggs. Wikipedia is not an
encyclopedia. It is just a propaganda factory for frauds. Personal opinion will always be deleted, idiot! It doesn't matter if what you say is true or not (I know it's not but that's beside the point in this instance), you have to have back up. Otherwise it has to be taken as personal opinion and removed. Opinions are for other Wikis (like this one - and even though they are rude and offensive, Uncyclopedia and Encyclopedia Dramatica also fit this category. Pick up some media coverage that supports your view, Fore Sam - then you'll get somewhere! But guess what - there isn't any! Fore Sam then provided a copy of the exchange, where known Amanda supporter Dave Seidel was involved. He knows the truth as much as I do about Amanda - maybe even more if Amanda held out on me, although if she did it wouldn't be much and it would only back up what I already knew anyway. It doesn't matter - I know enough. It included some material from November 2007 and at one point; THIS IS
RICH, A HORSE'S ASS LIKE DAVE SEIDEL CLAIMING ANYTHING TO DO WITH AMANDA
BAGGS LACKS A NPOV Well? You do, Fore Sam! So does Drucker and Ophelia - and Droopy! Dave's point of view has back up, and back up that fulfills Wikipedia rules! Big difference! The discussion was mostly between users SandyGeorgia (who has been in bother with Wrong Planet) and Appto, who I suspected to be a Fore Sam sock puppet (see my quote above), although now I think it's more likely to be a meat puppet. But when Dave Seidel inserted a comment after Fore Sam himself threw one on without logging in....well, see for yourself; The link to
Hating Autism should be left here because it has a year's worth of
discussion that, all together, shows unquestionably that Amanda Baggs is
not autistic. Yay Dave! And Fore Sam's rejoinder on his blog? HERE WE SEE
THAT DAVE SEIDEL HAS TOLD US THAT HIS WIFE KASTHLEEN'S BLOG IS NOT
CONSIDERED TO BE A RELIABLE SOURCE. For what? Is anyone claiming her blog as a source for anything not notable? No - so here's another straw man argument by Fore Sam. Hardly productive - but then what is productive from a meglomaniac? Fore Sam then signed in under the same user name he used here (Bettwice33), and uttered this; If Amanda
Baggs' blog is relevant and can be used as a link, Hating Autism should
also be allowed as a blog that, with Amanda's own words, disputes the
veracity of everything that Baggs claims. Hating Autism elaborates on the
disingenuous nature of Neurodiversity and Amanda Baggs. Neurodiversity is
simply an opinion, and a deranged opinion at that, that tries to dissuade
anyone from trying to cure autistic children. His usual rhetoric - especially his predictable bigotry towards inherent differences in the human race. He's anti diversity - any diversity. It's not an opinion, it's a way of life. Amanda has CNN coverage as previously mentioned. That makes her notable - before the blog even comes into the equation. When Sandy Georgia had a go at Fore Sam about personal attacks and warned him about the relevant policies; I thought
this was a discussion page. How can we discuss this matter if everyone's
deleting comments? Please read the page in the Bolen Report that I have
provided the link to. It explains exactly what's going on with Amanda
Baggs and Neurodiversity's attempt to obfuscate the truth about autism. He wouldn't back off the personal attacks on Amanda. Sandy quickly got onto him about bringing disputes from outside of Wikipedia in, and told him to stick to reliable sources - and that meant no blogs (including his). Of course, Fore Sam wouldn't listen; Sandy, Did
you read what Bolen had to say about how Neurodiversity, AKA Quackbusters,
manipulates Wikipedia? Whether you block me or not, that won't change the
truth. The truth can never malign anyone. Exposing a fraud is not
maligning the fraud. When a fraud's own lawyer admits that her client is a
fraud, as you can plainly see on Hating Autism "When the Music's Over",
and Wikipedia ignores that, you are taking part in the fraud. It's NOT true, Fore Sam, because you have no verifiable evidence! If all this went before a court run by the word (not the interpretation) of Wikipedia rules, you get your tail kicked! Why? LACK OF EVIDENCE! Bolen's article is an opinion, and nothing more. Reference was also made to a comment made by Daniel Drucker about a comment Amanda's lawyer supposedly made (a claim Anne Bevington denies). Wikipedia removed the comments Fore Sam made - but he wouldn't quit; So,
Wikipedia deleted my comments. I copied them and will be sending them to
your owners. I showed you the Bolen report that described how Wikipedia is
perverted by disingenuous editors and, I guess, a disingenuous editor
deleted it. Well, (beep!) you, I'll just put it on my blog and let anyone
who cares see how Wikipedia is engaged in fraud. Amanda Baggs will be
exposed as the fraud that she is and you bastards won't prevent that. This is the posting of a deranged meglomaniac. Amanda is not a fraud, and such is the narrowness of Fore Sam's thinking he is completely incapable of seeing it. He is obsessed - and for this reason he is a danger to his son. The result of this activity was that Fore Sam's blog was blacklisted as a link for Wikipedia. That infuriated Fore Sam and again he went after the editors; They are
blocking every effort to present the facts of this fraud. In effect,
Wikipedia is now a party to the fraud. Wikipedia is abusing autistic
children by allowing Amanda Baggs to lie to the world with her
misinformation about autism....Thank you, Wikipedia, for showing the world
that you are a corrupt bunch of child abusers. Allowing Amanda Baggs to
lie to the world about autism on your encyclopedia, unopposed by sanity,
makes you a party to child abuse. This is slander against Wikipedia. Read this, Fore Sam - YOU are abusing autistic children by trying to push a deranged point of view about Autism and it's origins that have no basis in scientific fact. YOU are abusing Amanda by lying about her, relying on heresay to form your personal opinion - an opinion that has no place anywhere on Wikipedia per their rules about Neutral Point of View (WP:NPOV) and Original Research (WP:OR). He then went into an argument between himself and Sandy Georgia on the Administrator's Noticeboard the previous night (March 10) Adding the
truth to a fraudulent article is far from link spamming. You are abusing
autistic children by allowing this article to exist without opposition. As if he'll get Wikipedia to act with this sort of abuse! He got a warning for that on the grounds of vandalism, and then someone called GetDumb added that he couldn't possible pass WP:NPOV because he was too close to the issue. Here was Fore Sam's response; The standard
for diagnosing autism is that it is diagnosed by age 3. Amanda was
diagnosed with PDD/NOS at age 20. Her lengthy diatribe aside, how did
every doctor she saw as a child miss all of the hand flapping, eye contact
avoidance, inability to toilet herself properly and other behaviors
consistent with autism? That behavior in a child can not possibly be
missed by anyone and that is the autism standard that Baggs is trying to
sidestep here. When does common sense come into play for Wikipedia? It is NOT compulsory for a DX of Autism to take place before age 3! That's the age it is possible by. And incidentally, Amanda was verbally DXed as Autistic when she was 14 or 15 - not 20! (PDD/NOS and Autism are on the same Spectrum as we all know) As for the rest - Amanda was HFA and before the DSM-IV in 1994 (the very year Amanda started at Simon's Rock) she would have been missed easily! The standard is far wider than Fore Sam thinks - and he refuses to admit it. He is actually applying a standard for LFA, not the entire Spectrum! So much for Fore Sam's version of common sense! The above quote got Fore Sam a harsh warning about his conduct, which included "I don't give a damn about whether you think Amanda Baggs is a fraud". He was told not to name call - pretty simple I would have thought. But Fore Sam's post banning reflection? Here we can
clearly see that the editors at Wikipedia, in their own words, don't give
a damn about whether Amanda Baggs is a fraud. Correction, idiot. What they don't care about is YOUR OPINION of her! Reading comprehension 101! The banning by Wikipedia was aided by GetDumb and Natalie who referred to Fore Sam's history, and Natalie observed rightly that "nothing constructive" would be added by him. I'm loath to reactivate my "Curse of Fenric" account unless I have to (as I did with the Wrong Planet problem I mentioned) to watch Fore Sam's IP, but given that Fore Sam had a new website at the time he may have tried again. Luckily the website collapsed. That wasn't the end of Fore Sam's whining though; Who ever
heard of an encyclopedia that could be edited by anyone who feels like
throwing in their two cents anyhow? It's obvious that Wikipedia will never
be a decent reference for anything when they allow frauds like Amanda
Baggs to advertise there. You can't just throw your two cents in against the rules, idiot! Plenty of people have been banned for the sort of thing you were doing (Jonathan Barber springs to mind on Wikipedia!) - and when there are reliable references there's nothing held back. That's the problem, Fore Sam. No reliable sources! Natalie came on and picked up that as well as re-iterating the conduct issue - but again; The same
rules should apply to Baggs. She calls herself autistic but her BS
diagnosis only says PDD/NOS. She should not be allowed to call herself
autistic. CNN said she is Autistic, idiot! And they are an established reliable source! You can't just say they lied without proof! And anyway - PDD-NOS puts her on the Spectrum. Therefore, she is Autistic! So am I, and so is every other Aspie! And when an anon came on and told him to go back and edit the problem; When
neurodiverse knuckleheads are the editors, it's not practical. No, it's not practical because you've been banned - reason being that YOU are the knucklehead for being so rude and obnoxious. Fore Sam 101! Going back a bit, Fore Sam had one more rant against Wikipedia - this time over the article on Mark Geier (master quack). On
Wikipedia's page about Dr Geier, there are links that take you to
controversies, to Neurodiversity, to the Neurodiversity Movement (where
they have a course description of to become a neuroinsane simpleton).
There, Wikipedia has links to blogs. They link to Kathleen Seidel's
completely dishonest and disingenuous rantings where she bashes people who
help autistic children. Wikipedia also links to about 50 blogs run by
complete and total morons associated with the Autism Hub. Some big differences here. First of all, Geier is notable. Second - there is a lot of coverage OUTSIDE of blogs that criticises his work. Third - the Autism Hub is also notable due to it's coverage and the sheer number of member blogs amongst it's membership such as Kathy Seidel's (and indeed my own ASD Blog). Blogs as embellishing sources are fine - they are not (and have never claimed to be) ORIGINAL third party sources. What Fore Sam wants to do is use his as a primary source - and that you can't do. They don't even use Amanda's blog for that. So,
Wikipedia has allowed links to a mass of crazed, lying bloggers who bash
esteemed scientists like Dr Geier, who is curing autistic children. Yet
they refuse to allow a link to a blog that takes great pains to point out
the fraud of a phoney autistic woman named Amanda Baggs who is spreading
false information about autism. Esteemed my foot! Geier is a quack - no mistake. YOU are the liar, Fore Sam - and you're so stupid you can't even see it. This bit of
deceit by Wikipedia is really all we need to know to conclude that
Wikipedia is not a respectable source for anything. It is manasged by
liars and they help to promote an agenda that harms autistic children. The person who has the agenda that hurts Autistic kids is you, Fore Sam. There is no deceit by Wikipedia. They know real deceit when they see it - and it's coming from your keyboard. In the comments Fore Sam was given some good advice about procedure, and all he could say was; In practice,
it is obvious that some neuroinsane knuckleheads are on the staff of
editors. No legitimate editor would assassinate my character for trying to
point out to them that an article was fraudulent. They also would not
allow links to the Autism Hub of insanity to smear Dr Geier. Wikipedia is
corrupt. The only person who was engaging in character assassination was Fore Sam! Hypocrisy 101! I already addressed the rest of this garbage further up. Geier deserves everything he gets, because he gets it from reliable sources OUTSIDE of the Autism Hub and other blogs! Natalie came back again - this time with an account - and referred to news sources and checking along those lines (perfectly reasonable) but that set Fore Sam off yet again. I see you
don't have much use for the truth. That's YOU, moron! Wikipedia
allows the Autism Hub as a link that is accessed from the page about Dr
Geier. The Autism Hub is nothing more than about 50 insane people who
campaign against curing autism. The Hub is notable as previously explained. News blogs
that do not allow comments that show Amanda Baggs to be a fraud are far
from legitimate sources. They are hiding the fact that they were conned by
these insane people who are opposed to curing low functioning autistic
children. Comment sections are irrelevant to the root commentary of the news blogs. Wikipedia is
engaged in fraud by refusing to consider the truth that has been
discovered about Amanda Baggs, that she was a normal person before she
abused LSD and magic mushrooms, etc.. There is no proof of this - so obviously it will be ignored. I know the truth, and Amanda's current condition had nothing to do with her LSD usage! Wikipedia
completely discredits itself by editors invoking my online reputation that
was provided to you by the insane people from the Autism Hub who I expose
as frauds. So, Wikipedia has been conned by Amanda Baggs and this
collection of idiots who intentionally put forth untrue rhetoric about
autism. What we say is true, Fore Sam. What you say is a lie - from the keyboard belonging to a lunatic. Natalie responded, calling on Fore Sam to discuss the matter reasonably within the rules if he had an issue - and queried Fore Sam's definition of "fraud". She also had a go at Fore Sam's lack of civility on the issue, and rightly so. But of course; You'll note
that I didn't curse the idiot that deleted my statements until after he
proved he was disingenuous and there was no further point in discussing
the matter with him. That's no excuse to curse someone, idiot! Criticise yes, but not curse! This jackass
could only have deduced that I had a poor reputation by listening to
idiots from Neurodiversity who assassinate my character because they can't
refute my words. Ergo bonehead, you did not listen to my words at all, you
had already made up your mind based on the words of the people who are
perpetrating the fraud. Does that explain the "(beep!) You" sufficiently
for your limited intelligence? Again, it didn't excuse it. And the poor rep comes simply from Fore Sam's own conduct on his own blog. I'm sure Natalie saw it and realised what sort of person she was dealing with. So of course she didn't listen - because you, Fore Sam, have no idea how to conduct yourself correctly! Socially inept much? Hello, ASPIE!! The whole
fraud is explained in 150 blog posts here. Why do you think Neurodiversity
goes to such pains to prevent themselves from being linked to it? They do
not want that fraud exposed. You can't make a valid decision on this
without reading the whole blog. Instead, you have taken neurodiversity's
deranged point of view and accepted it as sane. Sanity is the issue here.
If you can state that it is sane to promote an agenda that is opposed to
curing autistic children, then, and only then, can you accept one word of
opposition from Neurodiversity to my blog being linked to. There is no fraud, and one person's viewpoint plus a heap of sock puppets does not make a case. Natalie would have known this and so would the rest of the editors at Wikipedia. This is what Fore Sam refuses to see, such is his obsession with the issue. He can't see the wood for the trees....there it is again. Hello, ASPIE!! Sanity is the issue - and the insane one, Fore Sam, is you. There is no agenda at Wikipedia - except to maintain the rules. You don't
understand everything that is involved here. Neurodiversity is a sham that
purports to advocate for autistic people. That's the lie. What it actually
does is try to prevent any autistic people from being cured of autism. It
has made mildly autistic people who can speak for themselves believe that
curing their condition would be destroying the person that they are. The
mildly autistic people who fall for this lunacy are not intelligent enough
to know better. You have been scammed. This entire quote is based on one thing. Fore Sam's poor grip on reality. Neurodiversity is no different to any other form of diversity. Fore Sam opposes advocacy for those who are different - all because he is struggling with his own son. Why slap the rest of us around for that? There is no lunacy on our side of the fence, Fore Sam. It's all on your side. It's all boils down to your inability to accept difference. You are the scammer. I don't
misrepresent Neuroinsanity. Perhaps Kathleen Seidel, Autism Diva, Chew and
Leitch misrepresent it from what it was before those yo-yos got involved
with it. It's no misrepresentation to point out that, as it is now, it
exists to bludgeon autistic kids into never gaining relief from mercury
poisoning. You do misrepresent NeuroDIVERSITY, Fore Sam, because you want nothing to do with it. Fine by yourself, but your son is an inherent part of it whether you like it or not. The bludgeoning is being perpetrating by Fore Sam - the bludgeoning of the truth for his own ASPIE world! Yep - yet again, there it is. There is no mercury poisoning. One could
take a scholarly approach to this but it's so insane, it makes more sense
to simply make fun of them. As if anyone would believe Amanda Baggs was a
low functioning autistic girl before she fried her brain with LSD. Do you
really buy that BS? See now this is where Fore Sam gets it wrong. Amanda was NOT low functioning before she took LSD. She was HFA! As for it being more "sensible" to mock - do me a favour! No wonder he gets no respect. If he wants respect he should learn some manners. And learn about the truth. Autism
Speaks Basics I was just
banned from the Autism Speaks message boards for life. That's the second
time these geniuses banned me for life for going on their message board
and telling the truth about how autism is caused and how to cure it. They
even went to the trouble of going through all of the comments I put there
and deleting the link to this blog. That says a lot about the dishonesty
of Autism Speaks. No, it says that they want nothing to do with a mad man. Fore Sam's blog is poison - pure and simple. I wrote to
their office last week and asked them to consider the research Tim Bolen
had done to expose the organization known as Quackbusters. Austism Speaks
never wrote back. The fact that they left my comments alone but deleted
the reference to my blog just confirms that Autism Speaks has also been
infiltrated by Neurodiversity and Quackbusters. Neurodiversity has gone to
great pains to keep my blog from being referenced in Wikipedia and now
they have deleted the reference to it from Autism Speaks. Of course Autism Speaks never wrote back. This is all about shutting up a moron who is mentally unstable. Lenny Schafer saw it. So did Generation Rescue (he's no longer a Rescue Angel - Rescue Devil more like it!). When will he get the message? It is
obvious that this action must have been taken by a neurodiverse nitwit who
snuck into Autism Speaks and found a job as a moderator. If this was a
genuine person taking this action, they would certainly delete references
to idiotic blogs like Autism Diva's and a bunch of others associated with
Neurodiversity. No, this had to have been some friend of Amanda Baggs,
Neurodiversity's fraudulent spokesmodel. Trying to find excuses to justify himself - so he defaults to his favourite targets. Neurodiversity and Amanda Baggs. It was a genuine person acting against Fore Sam. A genuine person who knew a fruit cake when they saw one. The obvious action was taken, and it was to ban Fore Sam from the forum. Neuronitwits
have taken great pains to keep this blog from being seen. They complained
to blogger about it along with the Autism Fraud blog that is completely
dedicated to Amanda Baggs' fraud and had a code put on both of them so
that search engines could not find them. I contacted Blogger and explained
about Neurodiversity's insanity and they removed the code. Fore Sam lied to Blogger and Google. No doubt. I would have contacted them to counter it, but it subsequently came to light that they in fact didn't remove the code at all. They changed it. Still, Fore Sam won't get the message. It is nice
to see that Neuroinsanity is so terrified of what I have to say that go to
these extremes to try to keep what I have to say from being seen. However,
sanity will always prevail over psychopaths who intentionally harm
disabled children. Now we can add Autism Speaks to that group of
psychopaths since this action confirms that they are allies with
Neuroinsanity and Quackbusters in preventing autistic children from being
cured. Sanity will indeed prevail - when Fore Sam is locked up and his son gets the help he needs. The REAL help. Fore Sam is the psycho. He has harmed his son, who can not be cured. The same applies to all other people on the Autistic Spectrum. It was suggested that Fore Sam use a proxy to post at Autism Speaks. If I knew
what a proxy server was, I might try it. I can just keep educating the
public about what a bunch of nitwits Autism Speaks is from here though. Educating who? A bunch of meat puppets and a pack of panic stricken parents who are vulnerable to this BS? You're nothing but a vulture, Fore Sam. Someone called Axinar picked Fore Sam up on his conduct, comparing him to loud mouth priest Jeremiah Wright (who's attitude threatened to undermine Barack Obama in the US) and asked how Amanda Baggs had harmed his son. He also asked for an update on his son. Fore Sam ignored the request for info on his son, but; Amanda baggs
has harmed every autistic child by misrepresenting the truth about low
functioning autism. She is only harming your psych, Fore Sam, something that deserves not just to be harmed - but to be torn to shreds. Can you
believe some idiot there went to the trouble to delete all of those
"Vaccines Cause Autism" tack ons and left the comments there? It says a
lot about the management at Autism Speaks. It sure does. It shows some sense. Vaccines don't cause Autism. We need a
world free of children with poisoned brains. They grow into adults with
poisoned brains and join neuropsychopaths. You're the one with the poisoned brain, Fore Sam, and you are trying to poison others with your medicine. We - the human race - say "NO!". Axinar came back and asked a more specific question about Amanda and how she "misrepresented" Autism and how she harmed Autistic children with this. Baggs has
influenced public opinion with her acting. People who don't know anything
about autism believe what she says and think all autistic people can learn
to talk by typing on a machine. Many will also believe that autistic
people do not want to be cured. Autistic people can indeed do what Amanda has done -
if they want to. The vast majority of those on the Spectrum have accepted
their diagnosis and do not want a cure - or don't believe one exists
(which amounts to the same thing). No, the truth about the Spectrum is being obfuscated by nonsense like this. Fore Sam is a failure as a parent because he won't face the challenge. Amanda did - and is winning. Droopy didn't - and is losing what she has. Axinar criticised the breadth of Fore Sam's statements (and quite rightly) and copped this; Anyone who
claims they don't want to be cured of something that makes their life
difficult is not being honest. There is also the possibility that their
brains are so scrambled that they just can't make sense. Life wasn't meant to be easy, you idiot! You face the challenge! You don't run away! There are no scrambled brains - there are DIFFERENT brains. Just like different skin and gender. We know that
Amanda Baggs scrambled her brain with LSD as a very young college student.
I don't think you can find any sane person (that excludes everyone
associated with Neuroinsanity) who will agree that she is better off as a
college dropout who can't care for herself than she would be if she
finished college and found a way to unscramble her brain. Fore Sam loves playing the LSD card when it comes to Amanda. He's wrong. There was a problem for Amanda (seperate to her Autism) but it wasn't the LSD. It was the truck load of prescribed drugs she was fed AFTER that! Every sane person who knows the full story about the Spectrum will agree with Fore Sam's enemies. Amanda couldn't finish college. She shouldn't have been sent there to begin with. Such an
attitude only makes sense to people who are incapable of making sense. That says plenty about Fore Sam's logic. Those of us
who do not have brain damage all agree, yes 100% of us, that those people
with damaged brains need help. So why attack Autistics? No damaged brains here, idiot! Anyone who
disagrees with that statement either has brain damage themselves or they
are lying to promote a disingenuous agenda. As long as it is understood that damaged brains don't include Autistics - I don't have a problem with it. Axinar again went for the throat, accepting that Fore Sam didn't believe Amanda was Autistic. So she asked how to treat an Autistic - such as his son! Fore Sam ducked it as always. There is
treatment that would help Amanda Baggs. Putting her in the stocks and
allowing autistic children to smear feces on her might be just the cure
she needs. No, it wouldn't! An Anonymous poster got involved and put Axinar on the biomed track, and got duly rebuked, causing Fore Sam to bark back; The
therapies you dismiss have had a lot of success. We don't have all the
answers and nitwits who keep trying to deny the fact that the autism was
caused by vaccines are getting in the way of progress. Making yourself an
obstacle to that progress by carrying on like a deranged David Andrews
(sanity pending) makes you part of the problem. Success in what? Certainly not curing Autism! The claim that vaccines cause Autism is what's getting in the way of progress! People like YOU are part of the problem! Anons engaged Axinar before Fore Sam posted again to answer the query as to when Amanda started "faking"; Whenever she
decided to stop talking. Very funny, Fore Sam - Not. And Axinar got him a beauty when it was pointed out that being on TV was a massive risk if she was lying (good point!). Fore Sam's response? Someone who
started collge at age 13 may think she's smarter than the rest of the
world. In her interview with Donna Williams, it sounded like she had
memorized a textbook. All she has to do is wear sunglasses indoors to hide
her eyes, avoid talking and flap her hands for effect. She didn't start college then because she wanted to, you idiot! Sounding like a textbook is in fact an Autistic trait, but then Fore Sam wouldn't admit that. That last sentence barely touches the surface of Amanda's problems, and Fore Sam doesn't want to see that. Even if she
does have some permanent brain damage from the LSD, it still can't explain
why nobody describes her as having any symptoms of autism as a young
girl. Her parents do. Those who really knew her then would. They prefer to stay silent because of mad men like Fore Sam. And get off the LSD! That's not the problem! Axinar suggested that a combination of issues was the problem - but Fore Sam threw that out. Sorry, those
symptoms would have been evident as a child if Baggs was autistic. Brain
damage from LSD is not autism. They were, idiot! And again with the LSD - for goodness sake! I'm not sure
that Baggs is being malicious by faking her autism. Her association with
Tisoncik, who encourages lying to beat the system, and with Neuroinsanity
which is nothing but lies and stupidity may be more to blame for the
appearance of maliciousness. She might not fully realize the result of her
misinformation due to her damaged brain. That's slander against Laura. There is no misinformation. The low functioning part of Amanda isn't in her thinking. Common sense
should tell you that any child who acted the way Baggs acts now for her
performances would have been recognized as severely screwed up and given
some sort of label. The fact that she could attend colege at age 14
without staff to change her diapers should make you skeptical. No, it should tell you that you don't have all the facts. Jumping to conclusions is the calling card of a coward. That's what common sense tells me. Axinar, If
you want to present arguments to absurdity. try the Autism Hub blogs where
it will fit right in. In other words he was struggling to handle Axinar. Coward. The film of
Amanda at age 4 might show her without diapers and speaking. That would
put a crimp in her story, wouldn't it. No, it wouldn't. It is more likely to show other things - if such a film existed - that would put a bigger crimp in Fore Sam's story. I'd like to
be thre when the atheists in quackbusters find out they were wrong about
God. I'd like to be there when Fore Sam finally works out that he was wrong all along and that he did serious damage to his son. Heroes Do not try
to put any more links to perverts on my site. Unperturbed, Zoe went on and introduced a great analogy - comparing aeroplanes (NT's) to helicopters (ASD people). Different, but both can fly in their own way. And planes can't land on helipads! Brilliance! She also repeated the long held argument that Autism pre-existed even vaccines (let alone thiomersal), and also pointed out Einstein and Newton as Aspies who could talk. Autism did
not exist before vaccines. The books you read are wrong. Google
"Kanner". That's all he could say? Or utter additionally to prove it? Kanner's work - in terms of proving Fore Sam's point - doesn't prove any such thing. Asperger proves that - his work never got out until the 1980's. The scientific community was in bits in those days and didn't work together. If they had Kanner wouldn't have said some of the things it is claimed he said (such as the claim that what he was studying had never been seen before). Zoe wanted specific proof in writing that "Autism wasn't around before vaccines" while making the very same point I just did about Asperger. And I loved her comment "Just because someone has only just turned on a light doesn't mean the room didn't exist until then." Exactly! But not to Fore Sam.... Autism was
invented after vaccines were laced with thimerosal. That started in 1931
and Kanner diagnosed the kids in 1943. That's why there is nobody with
autism over the age of 77. Oh yes there is, Fore Sam. Joseph and Kev Leitch had access to statistics that proved that point blank! Last I heard there were three DXed on the Spectrum in the stats over 80 receiving services. And that doesn't include those who used to but not anymore! And I'd hardly call 1.25 micrograms laced!! A few anons came on and had a go at Zoe (typical sock/meatpuppets of Fore Sam) and she brought up the phrase "different wiring". And Mr. Literal struck again; You do not
have wires in your head, only thimerosal. Idiot! And Zoe picked that up - it's a figure of speech, or a metaphor as she put it. The anons tried to go to town when a second hero arrived in Russell, and he supported Zoe. The reference to genius's got Fore Sam's back up again; Aspies can
never achieve anything exceptional like Edison, etc. because the mercury
in their heads has killed too many brain cells. Being too stupid to
realize that a cure is good for you is sad. We'll cure you anyhow and then
you'll appreciate sanity. This is what Fore Sam doesn't get. We CAN achieve! And plenty! Look at Bill Gates! Look at Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys! I'd hardly call them stupid! Stupid is defined by bullying - and why be sane by Fore Sam's definition. Remember - he is insane! And to Russell suggesting Fore Sam go to an Aspie Group and learn? I've gone to
Aspie groups to try to educate them but they just weren't capable of
learning, stubbornly stupid. "Stubbornly stupid" describes Fore Sam to a tee. Zoe then mentioned Spielberg and Temple Grandin, and herself while Russell rattled off the usual genius list and challenged Fore Sam to prove him wrong. Typically Fore Sam ducked the question and concentrated on the group education by spouting; You are a
slow learner. Reread what I told you. Re read his answer, dummy! And poor Zoe got this insult; I'm guessing
you're NT boyfriend is deaf or desperate. More likely your wife is those things, moron! Remember, folks, this guy didn't get married until he was 40! And when Zoe told him it wasn't any of his business he persisted; Was he
gelded? No, Fore Sam - YOU WERE!! The most
dangerous doses of thimerosal are before a baby or a fetus have developed
a blood brain barrier. That's why the largest increase in autism happened
in 1994, three years after the introduction of the HepB shot on the day of
birth. That's why the flu shot to pregnant women is so effective at
causing autism. That's why lying bastards from the CDC try to tell us all
the thimerosal is gone from the shots when it isn't. This is Fore Sam's common argument - when the reality is that the diagnosis rate went up because of the DSM-IV, not the HepB shot. And even then, any LFA's would have been picked up in 1993 (and maybe 1992) if that was true. Did it go up then? Nope! As for that BS about fetus's. Again - if that was true the rate of Autism would be a lot higher than it is! He then went back to the previous insult line after Zoe denied the gelding; If he wasn't
gelded, what kind of sexual dysfunction does he have? Maybe we can find
some help for him. I'm starting to think that it's Fore Sam with the bloody sexual dysfunction if this BS is anything to go by! Hence HIS need for help! We had a third person come in - Sara. She blew off the idea of taking the decision out of the hands of ASD people, including children because caregivers (including parents) had to be responsible. Quite right - but that was the green light for Fore Sam to spew forth this old favourite; The only
people opposed to a cure for autistic children are disingenuous jerks
associated with quackbusters. Neurodiversity propaganda has conned a lot
of people who need help into believing that treatments that might help
them are quackery. This is not true. Curing severely disabled kids has
nothing to do with the gay rights movement which I think is disgraceful.
These kids don't have a choice about being autistic and their lives
completely suck. Let's not associate a bunch of perverts with disabled
kids. They have nothing in common. The only people supporting a cure for Autistic children are panic stricken careless parents who aren't coping and are too proud to admit that they need support and understanding - and fall for the con jobs of people like Fore Sam and the rest of the mercury militia. You can't cure Autism just like you can't cure homosexuality. If anyone is behaving like a pervert it's Fore Sam, given the way he's used children like Megan Leitch in the past. Sara rounded on him blowing off the idea that being gay (or transgender) was a choice, and added the "choice" of being ambidextrous - bringing this from Fore Sam; If you want
to discuss perversions, take your bull(beep!) to a site that wants to
discuss that. This site is about autism. Your comments addressing mentally
deranged people with sexual perversions are not welcome here. Remember - this idiot is homophobic, so he doesn't even understand that lifestyle and therefore can't make any comment on it. Sara translated that answer as proving that he supports genocide through forced sterilisation and she queried him on how he'd feel if he was forced into something against his will. Zoe weighed in with the genetic argument and specified eye colour (I've used that argument myself) and Fore Sam was onto it with his usual deranged rhetoric; When you
compare eye color to autism in terms of genetic mutations, you are
obviously mentally impaired. No, dummy, your refusal to see the point proves the mental impairment is at your end! Zoe shot back that the concept was the same and avoided a tit for tat mental DX quite obviously. The concept
is not even remotely similar, especially since autism is not genetic. You
are a mental case. Autism is genetic in origin - and Fore Sam is the mental case here, proved by his lack of education with that first remark. Zoe was quick to go back to demanding proof in the form of research papers that vaccines caused Autism (something she asked before and Fore Sam ducked), but then the sock/meatpuppets weighed in again homing in on the phrase "mental difference". And using it taking the definition of "mental" out of context. All Fore Sam could utter was; What good
can Zoe do? Can she cure her boyfriends sexual dysfunction? Ever the politician. Refuses to answer a straight question. Autism
Speaks again The Autism
Speaks message board is a place where you would think you could discuss
information related to autism and find some answers as to how to help
autistic children. While this is sometimes possible, the norm is that any
good advice that is given to parents seeking information quickly
degenerates into argument. Funny - this is actually true, except that the answers to helping children aren't what Fore Sam thinks. And the reason why good advice ends up causing an argument is because the trolls in reality are not the people he names in this article. The trolls are other people entirely. This is
because Autism Speaks is infested with vermin from the Neurodiversity
movement. No it's because it's infested with scum from the mercury militia. One notable
wacko is Margaret Toigo, an ex stripper who tries to present her deranged
opinions as though they were facts. This ugly slug (she couldn't have done
very well as a stripper) just keeps writing that vaccines do not cause
autism and rants on and on calling any doctor who helps an autistic child
a quack. I don't think most people are stupid enough to listen to this
brain dead nitwit but her tactics do disrupt intelligent discussion and
get in the way of parents new to the horrific world of autism from
learning the facts. Funny he should try to insult Margaret, when a heroine of his (Jenny McCarthy) comes from the same neck of the entertainment woods! The real problem is that people are stupid enough to listen to Fore Sam, and Margaret knows it. She knows that such discussion that Fore Sam calls intelligent is really a con job, so it's right to disrupt a con job and present the real facts. Another
simpleton from the Neurodiversity Cult is a woman who calls herself
Momof26 children (or something like that). Her real name is Jeannette
McDonald and she claims to have 5 autistic children. This woman is so
intellectually challenged that she refused assistance from Dr Wakefield,
the man who discovered that the MMR vaccine causes autism. She also
managed to wheedle herself a new house for free from that stupid TV show
that goes around building houses for people who have problems. I don't
watch the show but it might be interesting to see if it is sponsored by
any drug companies. Perhaps that sponsorship played a role in addling this
woman's brain so that she now claims all autistic kids need is love and
they'll be fine. From the looks of her kids, it seems that only one of
them has autism. The others don't appear to be that bad off. Refusing help from Wakefield probably saved the lives of her children! Wakefield's "discovery" is a crock and it's why he's before the UK Medical Board for malpractice. And even though I don't know the details of the family here - I know Fore Sam well enough to know he wouldn't know a Spectrum person if he fell over them unless they were LFA. I'm sure he wouldn't be able to tell that I'm an Aspie by just looking at me! No idea! That's his whole problem - he doesn't understand the whole Spectrum and he doesn't want to because it tarnishes his whole argument and he knows it. Auntie Em is
the pseudonym used by another nasty wack job who slithers around the
Autism Speaks boards. I'm not sure but I think this moron used to blog
under the name Soapbox Mom. This nut has never had anything useful to say
but she is adept at starting arguments to distract people from the
business of helping autistic children. Typical cheap shot and just as useless as he claims she is, if not more so. Then we have
Autism Diva, AKA Camille Clark. This infamous lunatic is an expert at
taking quotes out of context and trying to use them against the sane
people who uttered them. She's also good at character assassination which
she is happy to do for anyone she can dig up a little dirt on who helps
autistic children. She's one of the psychopaths who try to claim that all
chelation is dangerous just because one doctor committed malpractice by
giving a child the wrong chelator. The fact of the matter is that
chelation has been the standard treatment for mercury poisoning for over
60 years. Yet, this fat, old lady just keeps rambling on, ad infinitum
that chelation is quackery and it's all a scam to line the doctors'
pockets. The truth of that matter is that a lot of the parents who are
curing their autistic children are learning how to cure them from Dr Andy
Cutler and the Autism Mercury Group for free. This one goes way back. Camille has the qualifications to understand what is really going on, and knows that chelation is indeed dangerous for those who use it for anything other than mercury poisoning. Remember, Autism is NOT mercury poisoning, and this is the point. The children are not being cured of Autism at all. Any positives are coming from peripheral issues - something that is definitely applicable to Fore Sam's son. Chelation as a treatment for Autism is definitely quackery, and indeed a con job to line the pockets of the likes of Andrew Cutler. Next in our
list of Neuronitwits is a woman named Liz who uses the moniker Roo2. She's
married to a guy who's some sort of scientist so she must have him help
her with using scientific terms to distract people from the truth about
Vaccines. She has nothing at all to say that is useful to anyone who is
trying to help a kid with autism but she's a real pain in the ass when
decent people are trying to elaborate on the facts of how to help these
children. Or - idiot - she has a husband who knows what's going on (like Camille) and uses the science that Fore Sam shrugs off to expose the real truth about vaccines. Which makes her very useful - and creates fear in the black heart of Fore Sam. Matt is a
guy who is too stupid to converse anywhere near intelligently on autism
so, he hops around the message board using argument ad hominem to try to
discredit decent parents. He also butts into discussions and asks stupid
questions to try to derail the topics. A minor pain to sane people but
contributes enough disruption to earn a gold star from Neurodiversity for
his efforts. Matt asks smart questions. He may derail topics but only because the person he is derailing is an idiot who has no idea what they are talking about. Discrediting careless parents is the right thing to do. Li'l Bo Peep
is a woman from Long Island who looks something like the wicked witch of
the west. She persists in stating that Autism Speaks should be a place
where differing opinions can be exchanged, as though opinions from wackos
who oppose curing autism have any value. She seems harmless on the surface
but her contribution of stupid opinions helps add to the total effect of
this collection of liars spreading their propaganda. This is Fore Sam's whole problem. He doesn't want to hear alternatives. As far as he's concerned, the matter is closed, and anyone who says otherwise is a "wacko". That holds up his full understanding of what the Spectrum is, and makes him the deranged fool he is - and the liar. Next we have
some sad cases. These are the people who claim to be on the Autism
Spectrum and make the absurd asserion that they do not want to be
cured. It's not absurd. We have learned to accept our situation and know that it can't change. Others must change around us - or stay right away. That's how we roll, and we have the right to be that way - and there is nothing to cure. Except Fore Sam's intolerance. Beau seems
to be a nice kid who has been perverted by the Cult of Neurodiversity. He
isn't very bright which is obvious by his falling in with this strange
cult but he serves their purpose well with his "I don't want to be cured"
nonsense. He probably believes he is doing a good thing by participating
in this assault on decent parents and I tend not to blame him for his
disruption. However, it should be noted that whatever he says should not
be taken seriously by anyone. He should indeed be listened to, because he is right there where Sam is. At the coal face of the Spectrum. As indeed I am. We know and accept who we are, and that demands respect. There is no cult on our side of the fence. The cult is the Cult of Normality - of which Fore Sam is a charter member. There is
also a person known as Zarathustra who appears to be a 40ish lesbian from
England, although I can't state that as fact. Most of these people try to
hide their identities. She oozed across to Autism Speaks from the
extrenely wacky Wrong Planet discussion group. That's where people who
claim to have Asperger's make excuses for all of the bonehead things
they've done in their pathetic lives. And these losers don't need to be
cured, yuh right. Anyhow, Zarathustra flits around AS and interjects
inanities here and there as a few more bits of distraction, anything to
prevent parents from helping autistic kids. Wrong Planet is not wacky - although with idiots like Zendell and Le Kiwi around it's easy to assume that. And there are no pathetic lives there either. No one has a pathetic life when it comes down to brass tacks. There are wasted lives - and no doubt Fore Sam has one of them. And unlike a lot of people - he brought his pathetic life on himself. This comment oozes with the lack of respect for all diversity (not just neuro) that I've always said inhibits this fool. Zarathustra is on the money with her arguments and I say good for her. Some guy who
calls himself Darwin also haunts AS when he's not locked up for abusing
drugs. He and his wife are a couple of oddballs who, I think, claim to
have Asperger's. They're pretty good at derailing threads and adding
stupid pictures in that they think are comical. Neither one of them makes
any sense but, again, they contribute to the overall assault on decent
parents learning the truth about how vaccines cause autism. They make perfect sense, Fore Sam. You just don't want to listen because they disagree with you! That's
enough for now. I know I missed some of the nitwits who spread their
propaganda at Autism Speaks. It would be nice if one of the founders of
Autism Speaks recognized what these lowlifes are doing on their forum and
banned them all. First though, AS needs to ferret out the neurodiverse
moderators who allow these liars to spread their drivel. I think the forum moderators did a fine job kicking out Fore Sam. Now all they need to do is activate IP deny to stop him from looking at the forum and the website. Zarathustra was quick to tell him to search Google and that would be enough to prove that Fore Sam was wrong; If I was
wrong, my son would still be a vegetable. Time for you to stop talking and
start listening. You are wrong, and your son recovered because you cleared his gut. Nothing to do with his Autism at all. Some anons spouted their drivel, and bringing up one person brought this intolerant general remark from Fore Sam; I don't know
Judith Ursitti but Dover is one of those snobby towns where the teenagers
get BMW's for their birthdays. Probably shouldn't criticize the upper
crust who live there. Why not, idiot? Do they scare you because they have the money you don't? Or the life for that matter? Darwin
should contact Estee Klar and see if she'll promote celebrating the joy of
being a drunk. After all, drunks want to stay drunk so they don't kill the
drunken person by becoming sober. I think Estee should start defending
drunk drivers using the same logic. We should respect everyone's right to
stay drunk. We should accept it. Sober drivers should accomodate drunks
and make sure they get out of the way before the drunk crosses a center
strip and hits them head on. Trees should also be taught jump out of the
way of drunk drivers. Makes as much sense as her views on autism. This verbage was the result of another anon calling Darwin a drunk. Fore Sam's pechant for comparing us to drunks is sickening to say the least. I see Darwin
got diagnosed with HFA while incarcerated. I suppose every drunk and drug
addict will soon be using Asperger's as an excuse for their behavior.
Although, who's to say exactly how much damage thimerosal has caused when
it was given in lower doses that didn't turn kids into train wrecks? This was after someone claimed that Darwin was a drug user. So? So was Amanda Baggs for six months (LSD). What does that prove? Nothing at all. Thiomersal does no damage in it's regular dose in vaccines, so a lower dose would make zero difference. In the case of Aspies, it is unfortunately likely that drug usage may occur if they are way down in the basement of depression. Something that Fore Sam would have no concept of judging by his general demeanour. David
Wolman This post
also referred the reader to another blog post by Wolman in which one PhD
demonstrated his ignorance of autism because his kid was actually doing
things that Amanda Baggs had been faking. It's a shame when well meaning
but naive PhD's are conned by scam artists. Naive, my foot! That's his excuse everytime - if the person doesn't agree, they are naive AT BEST! We know by know what it is to Fore Sam at worst. Wolman has a
list of his articles that discuss topics such as bugs, grass and Mt Fuji.
It doesn't look like there is anything in his background that gives him a
clue about what autism is all about. How about - research? We've all heard of it. Fore Sam sure hasn't! Yet, this 33
year old wizard sees fit to ignore the concerns of people with extensive
experience in autism while he helps perpetuate Amanda Baggs' con job on an
unsuspecting public. You don't have extensive experience, Fore Sam. One person does not equal extensive experience - in fact because it's your son that experience is unreliable from the point of view of personal bias. There is no con job, because Autism is not as simple a condition as Fore Sam is making it out to be. The fact
that Amanda Baggs is not autistic has been brought to the attention of
Joanna Pearlstein, an editor for Wired Magazine along with David Wolman.
Pearlstein stated that she has no interest in writing about this fact.
Wolman has not responded to anyone who voiced this concern, as far as I
know. I think it wouldn't surprise me if more and more people in the media are being made aware of Fore Sam's attitude and are treating it with the contempt it deserves. Likewise the false statement that Amanda isn't on the Spectrum. We can see
on Wolman's blog that he does not like experts in the field of autism
pointing out the truth about vaccines and autism. He rambles on with some
junk about horrible diseases that we all had as kids with no ill effects.
This young genius who has, in has vast experience, learned about Mt Fuji,
bugs and growing grass must have all of a sudden become an expert on
autism by his association with a liar who began her descent into autism by
abusing LSD. No ill effects? I'll lay odds on this - I'll bet his contact with one of those diseases provided the sensory overload (per Doctor Thomas Good's theory) that put Fore Sam on the Spectrum! With the rest, go back to the research again - and not only that, it wasn't the LSD that started Amanda's regression. It was the mis-DX of schizophrenia (which was AFTER the LSD) and the consequential drug up by the quack responsible. So, there
you have it. Wired Magazine writes pure BS and refuses to acknowledge
anyone who points out their lack of integrity. No, they refuse to acknowledge meglomaniacs - and they write well researched material if David's attitude in general is anything to go by. Amanda Baggs
goes merrily on her way, misinforming the public about autism thanks to
mental midgets like Pearlstein and Wolman who tacitly agree to the LSD as
the cause of autism theory. Oh rubbish! In fact - I read somewhere that someone in Maryland was looking into the theory that LSD actually HELPS some of the symptoms of Autism!! So I'd hardly call it a cause! Anyway - Amanda was already on the Spectrum well before LSD and Simon's Rock. I wonder if
anyone who later determines that a flu shot to a pregnant mother caused
their child's autism can sue Wired Magazine for this misinformation? Can
their stupidity be held against them in a court of law? If stupidity can be held against anyone in court, I'll lay odds on that Fore Sam would have more to fear than anyone else. As you might
expect, David Wolman has deleted one of my comments from his blog asking
about his foolishness of not investigating allegations of Amanda Baggs'
fraud. You can hide from the truth Dave, but that won't make it go
away. This quote may have the wrong date on it because it was marked "update". I also went into the blog, and added comments when I saw an anonymous post identified by another anon as Fore Sam, causing him to log in and state; How nice to
see the anonymous trolls from neuronitwitville never cease defending their
fat actress. I then added to David about the Maryland thing (I didn't name the state, I just mentioned the research being done) re LSD, and that got Fore Sam to state; The LSD
won't help you. When you're a born simpleton, you're out of luck. Back on Fore Sam's blog, someone called John pointed out that Amanda had said on her blog that there was "neurological weirdness" going on before Simon's Rock. Quite right - although the choice of words wasn't exactly appropriate. Baggs was
sexually molested by her own family. Maybe that had something to do with
screwing up her psyche, but that ain't autism either. Face value judgment yet again. Typical Fore Sam - can't see the wood for the trees AGAIN (Aspie!!) An anonymous poster got all fired up (and I picked up some quotables from it) and all Fore Sam could say was; Your
deranged behavior here is the moronic anti-social epitomy of Asperger's
that could lead to sociopathic behavior. That's why you need to stop
defending frauds like Amanda Baggs and seek help for your brain damage. If letting fly in justified fury is brain damaged, the entire human race is in trouble. This does NOT epitomise Aspergers Syndrome at all. Fore Sam's comment epitomises stereotypical one track thinking with blinkers firmly wedged in place. He is the one who needs help. Final note - David started to mod Fore Sam out, and I say good for him. The new
website As I type this, the website has been having some difficulties (Instant karma's gonna get you wrote John Lennon - LOL), but he'll persist. This post that I'm quoting from has been deleted by the way - I hope that's a result of the message I sent to them alerting them to it. My right to
free speech has been restricted by Blogger. I have discovered 48
restrictions on my blog that prevent it from being found by search
engines. Blogger never notified me about these restrictions. I wrote to
them and asked them to give me an explanation. No answer has been
forthcoming. Evidently, Blogger has decided they can overturn our rights .
Is there a lawyer who disagrees with this and will sue the balls off of
Blogger? As I said - I underestimated Google. The reason they did this in my view is because the US is the ONLY country that has freedom of speech written into it's constitution. Google are recognising the laws of other countries that would frown upon garbage like Fore Sam's blog, so the less people find it the better. It could also be the case that Google may be afraid of getting sued for hosting this rubbish - which would be an additional reason. Google have done the right thing ignoring Fore Sam. He is blowing off the human rights of others (the ones he constantly abuses - including me) and doesn't care. All he cares about is curing his son and he has taken it upon himself to force that attitude on others pushing the Spectrum as a disease to be cured. He has no idea, and whether Google know this or not, his conduct has been a disgrace. The point about other countries was mentioned in a post that Fore Sam modded out; Some
anonymous nitwit from England was just stating that you should lose your
right to speak when you abuse it. Obviously, this jerk doesn't understand
the United States but I deleted his comments anyhow for trying to abuse me
without having the guts to back up his abuse with his, her or its'
name. If you lived in England, moron, you'd be gagged and there would not be anything you could do about it. The world doesn't revolve around the first amendment. The same would happen in Australia. Then it was pointed out that Blogger was a private company and exempt, causing this tantrum; Nobody is
exempfrom the ist ammendment you dumb (beep!). Again - no respect for the laws of other countries, or even US law if what was said is true! Another anon referred to the Wikipedia article on freedom of speech, and it also mentioned Google's TOS (absolutely right). Wikipedia is
not a decent resource for anything. I expose frauds who harm children.
Frauds do not have any rights since they are criminals. Anonymous cowards
do not have any rights either. If you wish to dispute what I say, you
should have the fortitude to back up your words with your name. I only
allow your words here to demonstrate your abject stupidity. Fore Sam gets names and pursues people digging up as much dirt as he possibly can to discredit them. The hallmark of a scared coward. Funny how he preaches the first amendment, but won't allow people to exercise the fifth! Hypocrite! And he is yet to expose a single fraud - and his conduct is bluntly the one that is criminal. So by his own definition - he has no rights. It was pointed out that his blog wasn't completely blocked off as specific searches did get results. And the same fool made the suggestion that Fore Sam should create an easy to read page stating all the "facts" about Amanda Baggs so that a reporter could get through it easily; I have about
20 different pages on Baggs that used to all show up on searches. Now,
only one or two come up due to Blogger screwing with my constitutional
rights. As far as reporters go, you run into nitwits like David Wolman who
won't respond when you tell him he was conned. I guess he's so stupid,
he'd rather look like a fool than expose the fraud and try to recover his
reputation. The person who's reputation is shot is Fore Sam's. Completely shot to bits. He doesn't realise that real reporters won't do anything because Fore Sam's rep has spread far and wide - by him emailing people and making an idiot of himself. He should try the Huffington Post - at least there he may be a chance. I wonder if he's even tried? It doesn't matter because that dirt sheet has already got a rep for lies. After all - David Kirby writes for it! Flagging all
of the neuronitwit blogs might produce the same result for them. I'd
rather treat this in an adult manner and have contacted a lawyer. Blogger
can't be allowed to pull this garbage. Well, boo hoo! They can - because it's clear that flagging the blog is what caused the restrictions. Objectionable content. I know I flagged it many times. Funny how he calls contacting a lawyer "adult behaviour" and yet when he got the warning letter last year he all but called that anything but! It got him nowhere of course - I'm sure that's why he ended up creating the new site, because the lawyer said he couldn't do a thing about it. Serves him right! Unfortunately (or fortunately) the site then collapsed and Google backed down. In a funny development the URL now goes to the Autism Hub! Fore Sam
Quotes (Timelord) Speaking for myself - I allow the whole truth. The trouble is Fore Sam doesn't know the whole truth and is more "crazy" than he accuses me of being. You don't allow crazy people to comment after all! A moron like
Phil Gluyas can flag your blog a million times and blogger doesn't even
ask any questions. But, if Phil had to write an opinion, anyone who looked
at it would throw a net over him. So, lawyers will have to be involved. I used the think that clicking on the objectionable tab was a waste of time. Now I'm not so sure thanks to the search restrictions. I think clicking the tab may have been behind that - and remember also that I'm sure I'm not the only one to click on said tab. I think Fore Sam worked it out eventually hence his shift to his new website. And the only person who would want to "throw a net" over me is Fore Sam. No one else - except for a pack of Anonymous Posters who do nothing to convince me they are nothing more than Fore Sam sock puppets - or meat puppets. Flagging
Phil Gluyas' videos would deprive the world of laughing at a raving
lunatic. No, the real reason he won't flag them is because he knows it won't work - because I'll fight back and make sure You Tube ignore him. I only have to point to his blog as evidence (plus this section). Fore Sam
Enemies That's all the quotes for this section. These pages will no longer be added to. The new material is now on the forum linked below. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
