|
MAIN MENU |
ASPIE UNFRIENDLY - FORESAM (QUOTES AT ME) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article - contrary to another opinion - is NOT a comedy piece. It is DEADLY serious, and the truth. Here are some of the quotes that were aimed squarely at me on Fore Sam's blog - but first I'll note his posting on the Wiki and the follow ups on his blog;
Hey Phil, I think you've gone off the deep end. Do
you own a gun? PLease get some help soon. I told him I don't need help. He does. I haven't gone off the deep end - he did. And he is yet to come back either. Of course, the pathetic bully shot back the following;
Wouldn't you call it cowardly to write ridiculous
nonsense about someone and then try to prevent them from seeing what you
wrote? Your enemies list is hilarious, Phil. Are you trying to become a
comedy writer? Blocked from editing, not seeing! I'm quite happy to put the real truth here. As someone else observed, "You can't handle the truth!" (Good use of the line from the movie "A Few Good Men"!) I called him a bully - and this was his pathetic response. It's a good ploy to call sane
people bullies because they point out your
insanity. You should be thanking me for telling
you this. A psychiatrist would charge you a fortune. A more intelligent response
would be to try Andy Cutler's protocol and see if helps you think
more clearly. I fired off a reply to this bully boy nonsense. Bluntly, he is the insane one. A megalomaniac as I have already said (I didn't say that there because I didn't feel the need). I haven't been poisoned by mercury. That's a myth (as stated in my article Mercury Poisoning - The Myth), so the protocol by that quack Cutler will do nothing. Just like it's doing nothing to cure Fore Sam's son's Autism. THE ORIGINAL
BATTLE
Autistics in institutions don't have any stress, don't drink, smoke,
do drugs or eat improperly. They would probably live to be 100 if
they existed. I didn't address this at the time and I should have. Autistics in institutions in the old days could not live to 100 because they were NOT looked after properly. They were drugged to the gills trying to eliminate a problem that wasn't understood. And the drugs are what contributed to the stress.
You sound like a simpleton who has not learned anything about
autism over the last seven years. We found the cause and can now
cure it.
It
seems you also need lessons in Reading Comprehension. I am not autistic, my
son is.
Geier gave
us proof as did Sallie Bernard and every parent who has already cured
their child.
Geier is recognised as a quick by several
experts. His views have never been verified by a proper analysis (see Wikipedia
if you don't believe me) so they should be treated with a grain
of salt.
There was a time, many moons ago, when the only
choice autistics had was to learn how to live with the autism. That
has changed. There is STILL no choice -
learn
to live with Autism. Because there is NO
CURE! You have clearly given up on your son because you don't understand
what it is he has. That makes you a coward - and an
unfit parent.
I suggest you join the Autism-Mercury Yahoo group and learn how to
help yourself. You're obnoxious but, once you cure yourself, you can overcome that
personality defect. You have the personality
defect. Accept it. It's a part
of you. Embrace it. Fighting it will end
up killing you - and your son......I'll start by making sure your precious
Yahoo Group gets shut down as a threat to the human rights as
ASD sufferers.
You are not tracing Asperger's in your roots. You're tracing an inability to
excrete mercury.
Einstein was not autistic. He was very intelligent.
People with ASD can't possibly be that intelligent because the mercury has damaged
their brains. Einstein was high functioning
Autistic - or Aspergers (probably the latter). Such people have high IQ's!
I'm a 131 BTW! Einstein's I believe was over 200. But he was still on the
spectrum. So much for your theorising! And he wasn't the only genius who
had the
disorder! A lot of the brains behind the
industrial revolution were on the spectrum, going further back than Einstein! And they
wouldn't have been able to do it without the positives being on the
spectrum brings!
There was no such thing as autism when Einstein was born. Eli Lilly
hadn't invented it yet. I wouldn't expect a low IQ person like you
would understand.
Oh yes there was! There ALWAYS was! It just hadn't been
DISCOVERED yet!
Sorry dufus, autism did not exist until
1931. You can prove me wrong by dredging up some 75 year olds,
good luck.
Einstein had Aspergers. Newton had it.
Other genius's from the 19th century had it. Why do you think they
were so smart and perserverative? And seen as eccentric? It's a spectrum trait
- doofus! Einstein and Newton were
intelligent men, not mercury poisoned. This screwball Neurodiversity
movement wants to claim that every genius in history
was autistic to obfuscate the obvious. They don't
want any of these children to be cured because it will prove the
malfeasance of the drug companies. It's that simple. No sane person rants against
helping children.
Everyone with
HFA and Aspergers are highly intelligent. That's a proven fact. There was no
mercury poisoning.
HFA and Asperger's have nothing to do with high intelligence. IQ
is inherited. IQ is
inherited - so is all ASD's. They are
linked whether you like it or not. It's why the IQ points remain
intact and in some cases go up to compensate for the lack of
social instinct.
Sam paid no attention to anything
until we started chelating him. You are ignorant of what has been learned
in the last seven years and it might do you some good to
learn it.
The chelatin had nothing to
do with it. You've done something else on top of it that you
haven't realised.
Kanner described autism as something that had never been seen before
in 1943. Kanner
could only go on what HE'D never seen
before - AND he was concentrating on Autism, not the other spectrum disorders.
Hans Asperger discovered Aspergers in 1944, but it remained hidden by Kanner's findings
until 1990.
If
you ever manage to get yourself laid and have a kid of your
own, you'll understand that sane parents help their kids. You are out to
lunch, pal. I can't have children because
of radiotherapy
- and I couldn't handle bringing up a
normal child anyway because of the lack of routine and autonomy. You're the
one who's screwed up. Screwed up by paranoia because you know I've got
you beaten.
You're
too incapacitated to become a father. That makes you a poor excuse for
a man. I am a man. You are an alien
living in a fantasy world. And by judging my manhood on my inability
in practical terms to be a father is
a pathetic cheap shot that any sane person would not respect at all.
At least I have the sense to know I can't be a father.
You don't.
I've had the same good woman for
12 years.
12 years? Is that all? I've had mine for longer
than that! And I'll just add to that and note that Fore Sam is in his 50's - which means he met his then wife AFTER he turned 40! What was he doing before that I wonder? When did I get Lee? When I was 24! Married her when I was 27. Not only that, Fore Sam doesn't have that woman any more!
I
know it must be difficult to accept the fact that your brain doesn't
work right. My brain works fine. Yours is
the one that needs help, you poor delusional human being. Your precious
theory is wrong, and it's a shame that
you won't find that out until it's too
late. THAT is the fact of the matter. I'd love to be a
proverbial fly on the wall when that day comes when you realise I
was right.
If I can get all
of the mercury out of my son's brain, he has a chance to
be normal. (deleted), you just proved me
right again. You want your son to be
normal. There is no such thing as normal.
You'll never get the son you want so stop trying. You can remove
all the metals you want from his brain - he will remain Autistic
for life.
The established medical fact is that the doctors
keep telling us there is no known cause or cure for autism. They
don't say it's genetic because they know it isn't. They just won't admit
the truth. Remove the ear plugs! They DO
say it's genetic! Which doctors are you listening to? The wrong ones
obviously - the quacks who have no idea, and they won't say either way
because they're scared of determined
stubborn mules like you taking them to court!
And I say rightly so! Get off their backs and let them do
their job instead of telling them yourself - when you aren't qualified to
do so! Privacy
invaded That resulted in me providing a link to the Phil's World website - an act I now regret.
You're very naive to think anything can be proved
in court.
Hello, pot calling kettle! You're right - and what can't be proved is
YOUR argument!
You're also naive
to think you can change society. You'd be much better off looking into
a cure. There isn't
one, as I said. To look for a cure to start altering DNA - and that's a
path the human race should NEVER go down EVER. Changing society is the
ONLY option - and the UN agrees (per the Universal Declaration on the
rights of the disabled). I'm no
extremist. I'm just a guy trying to do what's best for my kid. You are an
extremist. You can't duck the fact. As far as
this blog goes, all I've been doing is pointing out the stupidity of
people who share your point of view. Denying that kids are being cured is
stupid. No sane person is buying your bull(beep!) so the best thing you
can do is learn how to cure yourself. The differing behaviors along the
autistic spectrum relate to how much mercury one was injected with and
whether they can excrete it or not. The claim that your ancestors had ASD
just shows they were poor excretors of mercury. The
viewpoint that you hold is that of an insane person - driven that way by
the inability to cope with the requirements of a child with Autism. I am
perfectly sane, as is everyone who knows the real truth. In the real world
- you are wrong. Your inability to accept this fact is driving you mad.
You are in serious need of help and quickly. The link to mercury is not
proven and nor can it ever be. This blog will be seen for what it is when
the June 2007 court case throws the mercury theory out. Then what will you
do, hmmm? I can guess. You'll go completely mad - and I'll have the phone
number for the men with the white coats handy. I have accepted myself for
who I am. An Aspie. And proud of it despite it's pitfalls. It's called
tolerance. Try it sometime - if you have the guts! Asperger's
is mercury induced brain damage which means that you are proud of having
brain damage. The people who poisoned you are happy that you have that
attitude. They are thrilled that you are not sane enough to accept the
truth and sue them for their negligence. I don't need any help. Yesterday,
I caught a 7 to 1 shot at Aqueduct, a nice perfecta and a 12 to 1 shot at
Hollywood. Thursday, I shot even par 71, a nice way to end the golf
season. It should have been a 69 but I got tired and bogeyed two out of
the last four holes because I had been up late with my kid the night
before. So, you're right in a way. If I can cure my son, my golf score
will probably be under par most of the time. If I don't have to deal with
meltdowns while I'm trying to handicap races, I'll probably make more
money. Whatever happens in court won't affect me as it will have no effect
on my son's well being. If I manage to cure him, I'll file a suit and he
can testify for himself that removing the mercury cured him. If that
happens, any jury will rule in his favor regardless of what happens with
the Autism Omnibus case. You should try golf. It might be good for your
sanity. Asperger's
is brain damage no matter what the cause. No society will ever be tolerant
of you and your ilk who won't get off your asses and help yourselves. You
have no excuse for receiving poor treatment from people when you persist
in being a pain in the ass. All ASD's should be eradicated, not accepted.
I think you and Michelle need to be put in protective custody and cured.
Stop blaming society for your troubles and act like a man. That proves
you are a coward. I am a man. You are not. ASD's can NEVER be eradicated.
To do so would be genocide. You are the one who needs to be arrested and
restrained for your intolerance. Without ASD's we would never have had the
advances in science that we have had (read - Einstein, Newton etc). Phil; Wake
up! Einstein and Newton were way too smart to have been ASD. If their
brains had been poisoned by mercury like yours, they would have also had
inferior intellects. I don't care if you call yourself schizoid,
schizophrenic, or anything else. You are one looney tunes wacko. Pick
whatever name you want to use. You wake
up! You just proved that ASD's are NOT caused by mercury poisoning. They
were ASD! They had high IQ's! It's a fact! And you can't handle it because
it's the perfect contradiction to your wild theory. Accept it. You're
wrong. Even I have an IQ of 131. If I'd been poisoned I wouldn't have that
result either. And yet I'm ASD as well! You're even suggesting HFA doesn't
exist with that BS! Any more excuses? Sorry Phil,
High IQ's are evidence that a person is not affected by mercury since it
kills brain cells. Correct.
And high IQ's are a key to both HFA and Aspergers! Then how
can you be ASD with your low IQ? People with the highest IQ's are not ASD.
However, we recognize the fact that ASD is not a good thing. That's why we
try to help or kids. My IQ is
131. The average (I believe) is 90. You want to try for two out of three?
Quit while you're behind. You people
with ASD who make up your own IQ tests to make yourselves feel good just
can't compete with actual geniuses. The test I
did was approved by the Australian government. You love jumping to
conclusions don't you? And I never claimed to be a genius. I'm just smart
(131 is not genius level). You ASD
dopes think you're all smart just because you spend lots of time with your
heads buried in books. You just
called your son a dope because he's ASD. And the reason we have our heads
buried in books is because we want to learn! Which is more than I can say
for you! We can
figure out what we need to know without them. Oh that
says plenty about you! You don't want to learn! That proves it beyond any
doubt at all! The nitwits
can't even understand that they've all been poisoned and we're trying to
help them. You're the
one who's been poisoned, (deleted). Poisoned by paranoia because you want
a quick fix to your son's genetic condition. And it doesn't exist. This
blog is dangerous and should be shut down because you are demanding
something that can only be done by altering the DNA. Chelation
is not a quick fix. Autism is not genetic. Help yourself. Autism is
genetic. Established fact, (deleted). Honestly you lot are so incredibly
deluded! You think you're curing Autism? I think this treatment should be
properly checked out - I'll bet you're creating another monster! And this
delusion is why this blog is dangerous. It needs to be seen for what it is
- propogating false hope and attacking ASD adults like me. Well I'm
fighting back. And for my right to be me, and everyone's else's right to
be themselves - with an ASD. If you want
to fight to remain brain damaged, you have freedom of speech. Luckily for
you, the sane people will ignore your ranting as a part of your injuries
and will try to help you overcome your diminished capacity. I think you
hold a picket sign proclaiming your support for celebrating brain damage
in a busy public place and observe the strange looks you'll get. If you're
lucky, the cops will throw a net over you and you'll get the help you
need. Good luck. I am not
brain damaged, and if you utter that slanderous remark once more I will
start proceedings to sue your arse off, (deleted). And don't think I can't
do it either. I have a genetic disorder - and so does your son. Stop
lying. You know you are, and so do the sane people who read this blog. What is the
name of your genetic disorder? Is it fragile X? Is it the APO-E4 protein?
Is it just plain stupidity? All autism is some form of brain damage.
That's why the diagnosis exists. Sane people accept that fact, Phil. I'm
very scared that you might sue me. Do you care to make any other idiotic
threats tonight, goofball? The name
of my genetic disorder is Aspergers Syndrome. You've
been misdiagnosed. There is no such thing as Asperger's. It's only a mild
form of mercury poisoning. In some cases, it's simply being a nerd. Well that
just proves how stupid you are. I have the backing of FIVE psych's on the
DX of Asperger's. And don't you even suggest it doesn't exist! What are
you, a medical school drop out with delusions of grandeur? You must be the
way you're talking! Psychologists are pseudoscientists. They don't know
anything, they only make guesses. I then noted an article written by a fellow called Casanova - which I should do an article on if I get the time to - and I provided the link. This guy,
Cassanova, admits he's just guessing that these minicolumns are an
evolutionary thing. He doesn't guess about the cause. Richard Deth
explained the cause. Please read his work. He
presents a feasible option, and like the idiot you are you don't want to
know. The articles states that the minicolumns have NEVER been examined
before in this manner, and that includes the people you hold dear - like
Richard Deth. The practical facts of the examination are crystal clear -
the minicolumns are DIFFERENT in Autistics, and different not in a damaged
way either like you think. Casanova knew that, and hence the EDUCATED
guess that it was evolutionary. More educated and certainly more qualified
(as a neurologist) than you or any of your heroes! You put
lots of faith in guesswork. I think the minicolumns were larger due to the
autistic brains having to work harder in certain areas to bypass the
damage caused by mercury. My opinion is more valid than Cassanova's
because Deth's work is a proven fact. I suppose if you examine (deleted)'s
brain, it will resemble that of a monkey because she thinks like a monkey.
You may have a better chance of proving your evolutionary theory with
that. (deleted), if Deth's work is proven fact, why is it
being ignored? And don't give me the usual argument about cover ups and so
on because that's a cop out. I'll tell you why - because it hasn't been
verified! By people who KNOW! You don't know. OK neither do I, but the
point is that if there is no verification there is no FACT! Your
experience and mine clash - and the reason for this is that I have sought
knowledge across a much wider area than you have. I am Aspergers. Five
psychiatrists can't be wrong. One maybe, but not five. And the
psychiatrists here have the sense to KNOW that with such a diagnosis any
other testing is not needed. Don't forget that Australian doctors are not
influenced by overseas loudmouths, because the malpractice laws here are
much stronger than they are in the US. There is no guesswork - the DSM-IV
is all that is needed, and I fulfilled that to the appropriate level. And
now you're a neurologist with that observation about micro columns? Yeah
right! Get off your soapbox and shut up! The
psychiatrists are all wrong if none of them have bothered to address the
cause of the Asperger's. Maybe you wouldn't be a tosser if you could find
a doctor to help you. DSM only addresses symptoms and it misses lots of
them. Deth's work is verified by every kid who improves with methyl B-12
and every kid who is cured with chelation. My kid's part of that proof. If
you had a brain in your head, you'd make yourself part of it too. Who I am
not A very
strange character named, apparently, Phil Gluyas showed up here recently.
He acts like the typical Neurodiverse nitwit but this guy takes it a step
further. From what I can gather, he has had some trouble with a 16 year
old boy. So far, he won't tell us what kind of trouble it was so, one can
only speculate. Apparently, Phil has some sort of restraining order
against this teenager and is now accusing everyone who posts anonymously
of being this teen. That last part is a lie. There were only two posts from David Ayling, and they breached the now expired intervention order. And as everyone here knows - he was restrained for stalking me on the Net. An
anonymous poster told us he was Phil Gluyas and posted a link to his
website. Phil did not deny this was him but now he has a different story.
He has even threatened me if I don't remove the name Phil Gluyas from the
site. He also had some guy who calls himself a solicitor interact on his
behalf. Is a solicitor a lawyer in some parts of the world or is this guy
a salesman? I don't pay much heed to threats from salesmen and even less
to threats on blogs from alleged lawyers. I said this a number of times at the time and I'll repeat it. I NEVER referred to myself by my full name on Fore Sam's blog. The link was provided - yes (as I explained earlier here), but it was not an open invite to reveal my full name. Andy (Eagle Eye) also got involved at my request as I had a trip to Adelaide to go on at the time, and had his first experience as an active lawyer - albeit not in the normal way (after all Andy was at the time still studying for his law degree). The
pending psychologist, David Andrews loves to make empty threats of legal
action. I wonder if he is involved with this nonsense. Here's your chance,
Phil. Why don't you post here under your real name and clear this matter
up. We'd all like to know what the restraining order is all about. I wasn't going to be dictated to and didn't bother - even when he transferred some of my comments from other posts in order to make a cheap point for his own benefit (and confused another poster as well). The court
room "drama" *Judge: Mr Gluyas, what is your
complaint? I responded thus; *Judge: Mr Gluyas, what is your
complaint? Try again
from there, (deleted)! You have no idea what I would say in reality! PS A
golfer's slice is a physical problem, which can always be solved! so I
found that part hilarious in it's sheer stupidity! I wish I
could be there to watch you present your case. I'd get kicked out of court
for laughing too hard though. I did respond to this, but it was deleted (no surprise in that) and unfortunately I have no idea what I said. I did get a post added later that noted the fact, and; Mr
Gluyas; You just put your name on my blog again. You have thereby
nullified your case. If I told you you had leg damage that prevented you
from running, you wouldn't be offended. Why take offense because I point
out that your brain is damaged? You should be looking for a DAN doctor to
fix your brain and a lawyer to sue the bastards that poisoned you. Did I put
my surname on that post? No. I have NEVER put my surname on any post in
this blog. Christian name - no problem. And the only reason the surname
became a problem was because it attracted the stalker! Get it through your
thick skull, idiot, that it was YOUR fault! I didn't
post your last name and I don't know who did. It's not my fault in any way
whatsoever. But, once it comes up, it's public knowledge so you're out of
luck. It IS
your fault because you didn't edit out my surname when told to! And
consequently added it to TWO threads titles! More
rubbish That
means that all forms of diversity (racial, cultural and religious) are
also shams. I can
prove all improvement is due to chelation. As you
have no medical qualifications, you can't. Pure and simple. I have nedical qualifications. I'm curing autism.
That makes me much more qualified than every MD who refuses to treat
autism and lies about it not being mercury poisoning. You have
no qualifications as an MD. Therefore, you have absolutely no right to
preach what you are preaching. You can blab all you want, you don't have
that piece of paper that clears you to make your claims. You have a great
deal more to worry about than I have, believe me! You don't
give me orders so you can not tell me to remove your name. You can ask
nicely but the answer will still be "No". Therefore
you support the attraction convicted internet stalkers to your blog. Which
make you an accessory to the activity. Well done. We just
can't get the FDA to admit the truth about autism actually being mercury
poisoning. Of course
you can't. Because the FDA know it's NOT the truth! It doesn't matter
about the general clearance of chelation to treat mercury poisoning.
Chelation has NOT been cleared to treat ASD's! FACT! I suppose
the positive thing you have to contribute is your yapping about wrestling.
Only morons talk about wrestling. Like to see how long he survives amongst the respected wrestling fans and participants around the world with comments like that! We have to
accept his differences until he can be convinced to help himself. It would
be inhumane to let him wallow in the abyss of autism without offering to
help Phil overcome his brain damage. I am not
brain damaged, (deleted)!! I told you not to call me that again! Right -
that's an addition to the folder. Defamation in that the defendant
referred to the plaintiff as brain damaged. *presses print button* I'll
tell you what's inhumane, (deleted). Your intolerance of neuro diversity.
You treat it like a disease! What other diversity don't you tolerate?
Racial? Cultural? You might as well with that pathetic line of yours! Chelation
has been the standard treatment for mercury poisoning since the 1940's. It
just happens that nobody figured out autism was really mercury poisoning
until about 1999. That news is just reaching Australia, although I do know
people there who have cured their children with chelation. Autism is
NOT mercury poisoning. That's the unverified view I'm talking about!
Chelation may cure mercury poisoning, but it doesn't cure Autism! Got it
now? Autism
equals Mercury Poisoning. If you dispute this, explain why there was no
autism before 1931. Also, explain what else could cause this epidemic.
And, explain why chelation cures it. If you can't do that, shut up. Most of the
genius's of the 19th century were high functioning Autistic. Isaac Newton
for example. And I mentioned Albert Einstein. And my own grandfather with
Aspergers! Got any other bright ideas? It's a GENETIC condition! That's
the explanation - and you don't have the medical qualifications to prove
YOU are right! No geniuses
are autistic. The brain damage caused by mercury would nullify any high
intelligence. Geniuses are a little different tham the average guy but
they are not autistic, just intelligent. That's the
point you REFUSE to see. Autism is NOT BRAIN DAMAGE!! It actually provides
advantages in focus outside of social instinct. The genius's I referred to
would never have had the time or opportunity to do all the work they did
with the dedication they did if they were socially aware! Being ASD has
positives! Of course you can't see that because you don't want to.
Coward. If you had
read Deth's work, you would know that mercury makes it impossible for kids
to pay attention. That's what autism is, a lack of attention. A genius has
to pay attention to what he's doing. Ergo Mr Brain Damage, Einstein was
not autistic. I did respond to this, but the post was deleted again (no suprise there). I think I said that we CAN pay attention - to our special interests (which fits what the genius's were doing perfectly). I think I might have also called Deth a quack in the same way as Geier & Geier. I got a response accepted to someone else though. Just
because you are not normal doesn't mean there is no such thing as normal.
You have not experienced normalcy so it's tough for you to understand it.
My argument against Neurodiversity is only against their idiotic assertion
that autism should not be cured. I obviously agree with other things they
say about decent treatment for autistic people since I am the father of an
autistic person. As a father, it would be negligence on my part if I did
not try to give my son a life free from the suffering he now endures.
Since you are not a father or a normal person, you can not understand any
of this. I suggest you try to fix your damaged brain. I suggest
YOU fix your damaged ego, (deleted). I am not brain damaged. I am
different - and I am proud to be so. That is a good thing. You call it a
bad thing. That's the same as being black is a bad thing. Which makes you
a racist. Don't deny it - it's all about genetics. Genetics makes people
black. Genetics makes people Autistic. I know what your definition of
normal is - and it's wrong. Way wrong. And completely and utterly devoid
of any commitment to human rights. You're pathetic, and if anyone deserves
to get locked up it's you. You have no idea what normal is - because you
are trying to define the undefinable. Oh and if you want your son free of
suffering - start looking after him properly. And for starters, accept
that he will never fulfill your definition of normal. Until you do, you
are failing your son because you do not accept him for what he is.
Understand and learn to like Autism for it's positives because they do
exist. And teach your son how to cope with the negatives, through
psychological help from training psychologists. Something that I could
have done with when I was his age (whatever age your son is) - and I'm
talking about understanding. That never came until I was 32. If autism
was a genetic condition, there would have been some autistics around
before 1943. There were,
as I have already explained - and of course you refuse to listen as usual.
The word Autism was first used in 1912 (see Wikipedia). Almost 20 years
before thiomersal! Soon, it
will be mandatory that all autistics seek treatment so they can become
productive citizens and end their suffering. Once they are all cured,
including you, you will be thankful that blogs like this helped to spread
the word that a cure was available. Since you are currently suffering from
mercury induced brain damage, I don't expect you to understand until after
you're cured. So, I don't take any offense at your ranting. It's a product
of your brain damage and I just hope you get well. Psychologists can't do anything to improve autism. All
they do is listen to problems from weak people who can't help themselves
while they pick their pockets. They have no business being involved with
autism. Check my post on the Pending Psychologist to see how useful they
are. They can
improve the ability to cope with it. That's their job. And that's all that
can be done. I repeat - I am not brain damaged. You are a threat to the
diversity of the human race with your attitude and for the sake of the
diversity of humanity you have to be silenced. You're the very sort of
person that justifies the existence of every extremist group on the planet
- and of course you don't give a crap. Give a crap. Accept disability.
Accept diviersity. Or live for the rest of your life in a crater because
you'll be shunned by your son when he realises what you've tried to do to
him - and if your wife is smart she'll leave you as well. Chelation
might only be marginally useful to you since it can't reverse stupidity. I
doubt you or anyone who is diagnosed as an adult is truly autistic. I
think you're just a wacko who found a way to beat the system and avoid
working. I'm not
stupid. You're the stupid one. When one puts their fingers in their ears -
it's polite to shout. My IQ equals 131. Your IQ equals probably about 80
at an unqualified but logical guess! Doesn't make you completely stupid,
but it doesn't make you very smart either. If stubborness counted as
stupidity your IQ would be about 15! You can
sell Tshirts. It's easy. The shirts sell themselves and you don't have to
interact with customers. Maybe you could hang a sign on your neck that
says "Autistic, Can't work" and hang around downtown where people will
throw you quarters. Why would I
want to sell such a pathetic line of merchandise? Give me a break! Mr Kirby is
a respected author and need not reply to lunatics like Kathleen, no matter
how much of a pain in the ass she is. Kathy's no lunatic - and any person who refuses to answer perfectly reasonable questions (unless the person asking has already demonstrated a refusal to listen - which doesn't apply here) is a coward who won't be held accountable for their statements. Maybe they
never removed the mercury. That's what they did here, why not Canada too?
If kids in Canada get less help, it's due to the efforts of your wacked
out postal worker who thinks she's a researcher. I responded to this with a quote from a link that I have since lost, titled "Pervasive developmental disorders in Montreal, Quebec, Canada: prevalence and links with immunizations." Pediatrics,
the publication run by the group of idiots who put the mercury into the
babies. Enough said! Says you!
Got proof? Proof? Are
you for real? Was it aliens who injected mercury into babies via
vaccines? Why is
Autism still being diagnosed when there is no mercury? How do you
know there's no mercury? How do you
know they're lying? Silence! Michelle's
philosophy condones child abuse. Such nonsense will be eradicated soon. YOU condone
child abuse by doing the wrong thing, (deleted). And your attitude is the
one that will be eradicated when the lies of the so called epidemic are
exposed. And you'll lose you son, you pathetic poor excuse for a parent!
You'll never eradicate us. Because to do so would be genocide. Hello,
Saddam! Hello, Slobodan! The
neurodiverse nitwits overstepped their bounds when they decided they could
tell everyone that curing autism is wrong. We are not
saying it's wrong, we are saying it's IMPOSSIBLE!! Get that through that
polluted poisoned attitude of yours, (deleted)! Autism and all other
disorders are genetic in origin. It's there for life, no matter how much
chelation you apply! And by not accepting that root problem, YOU are
endangering your child. YOU are harming him. YOU are the child abuser. And
we know it to be true. So get your head out of your arrogant arse and stop
playing with the order of evolution, arsehole! Simple
Simon; Thousands of parents have already proven it (curing Autism) is not
impossible. And thousands of doctors refuse to verify that. What does that tell you? It's BS - that's what it tells me! And Fore Sam calls ''ME'' Simple Simon! Your IQ
will increase after you remove the mercury, Phil. Don't wait! I'll wait. Fore Sam has already labelled me "brain damaged" and "dumb". Sorry, but I'm neither. IQ is 131. And calling me "brain damaged" is vilification on the basis of a disability. And there is NO mercury in my bloodstream - just in my mouth (in my teeth). I'd stopped regularly posting on the blog after this time - except on sporadic occasions. A NATURAL WAY
OF BEING Informer;
Even Leitch is smart enough to know he shouldn't associate with total
nitwits like Phil. I would expect that from this brain dead fool. I'm sure
Kev will let Phil right in. Kev's such a screwball, he won't even notice
that Phil is out of his mind. Someone had left the Autism Hub, which is what led to this remark. At least I have my two feet on the ground. I'm not up with the hysterical fairies like this idiot. If he had a
brain in his head, he'd understand that autism is not a natural way of
being and that he should, at least, have her tested to see if she is
affected by mercury. OK THAT
DOES IT!!! I am now 100 percent SICK AND TIRED of you, (deleted)! I swore
I would never post on here again, but now you've crossed the line! HOW
DARE YOU! Genetics isn't natural?? Next you'll say being black isn't
natural! GET A CLUE YOU IDIOT!! Your anti diversity rhetoric is blowing a
hole in the progress of the understanding of humanity - and for that you
can only be 100 percent CONDEMNED! I am only going to say this once - and
get it through your thick skull. AUTISM IS NOT MERCURY POISONING!!!! The
only thing that needs to be cured is your pathetic ivory tower attitude
towards the NATURAL (yes you heard me) diversity of the human race.
Celebrate that diversity, and get off your vilification band wagon you
discriminating moron!! (Apologies to a person who I emailed - he knows who
he is - but this needed to be said. I've had it with this
BULL(beep!)!!) Your
stupidity may well be a natural condition for which no cure exists. Your
autism, however, is not. Some conditions with symptoms similar to autism
are genetic. Autism, as described by Kanner and invented by Eli Lilly is
mercury poisoning and is curable. I think you may be one of the weirdos
who diagnosed yourself as an excuse for being weird. That is not autism.
Weirdos usually are a product of weird parents and it has nothing to do
with autism. You need lots of help, Phil. "The Oxford
English Dictionary states that he also named 'autism' in a 1912 edition of
the American Journal of Insanity." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Bleuler. And a reminder. Stupid? My IQ equals
131. That was all that was aimed at me until April as I worked on getting the Wiki up and running. Dragon, You
sound like Phil Gluyas. Did you see the study that found wrestling fans to
be brain dead and easily misdiagnosed as autistic? Did Fore Sam see the study that found that gamblers and golfers are more likely to be on the Spectrum that wrestling fans? THE WARNING
AND SO ON I'm going
to alert the FBI about you. You're delusional. You need help before you
become dangerous. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Go right ahead and tell the FBI about me, Fore Sam! I dare you! And I'll tell you what will happen. They'll come right to YOUR door with the men in the white coats and haul YOU away. The opening line on top of this article in green is 100 percent accurate. You just can't see it because of your own delusional thinking. I'm not dangerous. You are - especially to your son. The FBI
would make sure Phil didn't gain entrance to the USA. I was a bit annoyed with this "Informer" telling Fore Sam about the details of my latest updates, but anyway. It will probably please Fore Sam to know that I have no plans to visit the US - at all. Not possible in practice. But if I did for the sake of argument, I doubt the FBI will block me once I tell them all about Fore Sam and his abuse of people's choice! Phil is so
far gone, they won't even let him into the Autism Hub. Oh but they did! As soon as I transferred the stuff from my blog over to another new article here and a short delay, I was added! All I had to do was get the anti Fore Sam stuff off there. Whatever
you say, Phil. How are things in Fantasyland today? You tell me! You're the one who lives there, not me! (This was in reply to him claiming that someone else was me and I went onto the blog and corrected that myth) I notice on
your Enemies list that I'm near the bottom of the list but you claim I'm
your biggest enemy. Shouldn't you move my name up so I'm at the top of the
list? I worked hard for this honor and I don't like being stuck at the
bottom. Won't be moving. Because that's not the way I decide the order in which they appear. For the most part, it's chronological. Both in the order I create the article, and in the order the enemies became enemies. You are a recent enemy - which is why you are where you are. To be at the top, you would have to have become an enemy before October 2004 when I first came across the two who are first. Too bad! Oh - and I do NOT have mercury poisoning. Phil showed
up here and got in my face. I just defended my position. Wrong, bubble brain! Your entire blog gets in the face of everyone who knows the truth. I was the one defending my position - and another person (see the very first quote on the original article here for it) while I was about it. It's a shame that the US legal system is so rigid no one here will touch it. I would have had the blog shut down by now otherwise. But I haven't given up yet. I just have bigger fish to fry here. I'm still
upset though that he calls me his biggest enemy and won't put me at the
top of his enemies list. Oh wah wah wah wah WAH! I explained this before, and like a spoilt brat he whines! "Oh please put me first! You have to put me first!" Sheesh! Why don't you just chuck a tantrum and be done with it! Grow up! No, Phil's
ranting has no validity. Seidel is a muckraker not a researcher. He doesn't agree so he defaults to the abuse! Typical! If anyone is doing the muckraking it's Fore Sam! JOEKER'S
INVOLVEMENT Joeker,
don't bother trying to reason with Fore Sam. He is convinced that all
ASD's are caused 100 percent by mercury poisoning and that the different
wiring of our brains can be re-wired "correctly". The man's a meglomaniac,
Joeker. You can't reason with a person like that. He's determined to drive
us into the ground like the bully that he is. To do what he thinks is
possible with chelation can only be done with brain surgery. There's no
other way. And of course the human race doesn't understand a tenth of how
a brain works in reality. Fore Sam just won't accept that his son will be
Autistic for life. The most he's done with chelation is take away the low
functioning aspect - and that's only because he's taken out the heavy
metals from the boy's intestines, which were majority caused by the food
he was consuming. Not by mercury in vaccines. Better to just ignore him I
think. Fore Sam is a delusional fool. And he is the one being fooled BTW.
He just refuses to see it because his mind is dominated by conspiracy. Fore Sam's response? You're not
a freakin' robot. You don't have wires in your head, just mercury. The idiot has to be on the Spectrum! He took me LITERALLY! Classic symptom! Obviously he doesn't know a figure of speech when he sees one. And he hasn't heard of synapses either (which is an example of that). Conspirators don't advertise the treachery they
perform. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! That's EXACTLY what conspirators do! They just don't see it as treachery because they don't have the intelligence to! Gee I wonder who I'm describing? It's a shame that Fore Sam's attitude ended up creating the extremely paranoid Joeker that now inhabits the once docile 18 year old. EUGENE
BLEULER This was after quoting something from Eugene Bleuler's work (the man who discovered schizophrenia in 1908) and that quote was, "Bleuler is credited with the introduction of two concepts fundamental to the analysis of schizophrenia: autism, denoting the loss of contact with reality, frequently through indulgence in bizarre fantasy, and ambivalence, denoting the coexistence of mutually exclusive contradictions within the psyche." Remember - this was 1908, when understanding and tolerance wasn't as advanced as it is now. If a doctor from the early 20th century saw Fore Sam's son when he was doing what all LFA's do - he would have said the same thing. The boy had lost contact with reality, indulged in bizarre fantasy.....listen - this was the way doctors thought back then. Anything that wasn't normal frequently got labelled "bizarre" amongst other synonyms. The co-existence side of course is not Autism (that's definitely the schizophrenia we know today) but the rest is EXACTLY why the two got confused! Informer took the bait I offered when I had this on the old set up here, and posted what I said above on Fore Sam's blog. And Fore Sam's response? Doctors
were smart even in 1908. If autism had existed, they would have known it
was something much different from schizophrenia. The two conditions have
nothing in common. He obviously didn't read what I said! Typical! The first part was AUTISM! The two DO have things in common you idiot! It's medical fact! As far as the doctors being smart is concerned, Fore Sam knows nothing about history. In 1908 when Bleuler did his work, the church was still very much in control (socially) of society. No matter what doctors thought, it was never acted on because people were religiously scared of those who were not seen as normal. So the pressure was on for any doctor who wanted to help to shut up - because the church knew better. As I recall my history - in 1908 there was still a lot of conjecture about the theories of Charles Darwin (there still is today but nowhere near as much as there was then) and science still had a long way to go to achieve the sort of understanding that Fore Sam seems to think was the norm back then. News flash, moron! It wasn't! The doctors were being held back by the church. Fact. Bleuler went as far as he could without being ostracised. If he'd done the right thing as Kanner eventually did in 1943 (when the church had endured two world wars and had their faith in humanity well and truly shaken) this argument wouldn't even be taking place. Phil
references your comments while he writes about me on his blog. I have no
way to communicate with him. Gutless wonder! Comment on your blog! I'm watching it and you know I am! Let's see a thread on it! Come on! You know you want to! AND THE
GARBAGE GOES ON Earth to Fore Sam - EVERYONE on the Net does this sort of thing! It's not exclusive to ASD's! Anyway, we don't like it until we have it explained to us, so you just exposed yourself as one of us AGAIN! (I posted this on the blog - I couldn't resist it! And he did reply) No,
everyone on the net does not use this adolescent code. Weirdos who spend
all their time on the net may use it but normal people just talk
normally. That just goes to show how little he knows about the Internet! Gee there's not a lot he does know! And of course; Phil, You
are one of the dumbest people on the face of the earth. You're too stupid
to realize that there is help available for your Asperger's. It might even
give you a few precious IQ points if you were to try to cure yourself.
Please get some help. This got a reply on his blog with his name edited out; Fore Sam, I
don't need to sort of help you are advocating - because it's a placebo.
Pure and simple. As for my IQ it's already higher than yours, so why
should I? Anyway - if anyone is stupid it's you. The truly sane people who
know agree with me. You are a meglomaniac who needs to be restrained PDQ!
And diagnosed with an ASD - because you are definitely one of us, Fore
Sam! Whether you like it or not! And just how much is your own chelating
doing for you, huh? One big fat GOOSE EGG! And all it did for your son was
reduce the sensory overload and that's all. He's Autistic for life - all
you've done at best is replace LFA with HFA, and that's all you'll ever
get because ASD's can NOT be cured. Full stop! (And I'll bet you'll come
back with more heinous rhetoric like you usually do - I'll put this on my
Wiki just in case you don't have the guts to let this 100 percent accurate
post through!) It was let through, and it was responded to... Phil, I
haven't said what my IQ is. It's about double yours. His IQ is 262??? Oh yeah right! Next joke! Someday,
you'll be rounded up, locked up and cured for your own good. We can't have
crazy people like you running loose. You are absolutely right - we can't have crazy people running loose. That means you, meglomaniac! You support the same ideal as Hitler did with the Jews - kill all ASD's if they won't be chelated. Eugenics. It's been said by others as well as me time and time again - YOU ARE ONE OF US!!! In spite of the chelation, YOU ARE ON THE SPECTRUM! And you can't do any more about that than you can about your son! I posted that on the blog - along with an altered version of the previous comment, and I added a response to two other people including Joeker. I dropped in at the library - and I ended up posting a response to the replies to the posting I put above. Trouble was I didn't record it because I couldn't, and Fore Sam refused to publish it. I told him off for his cowardice thus; And you
call me a coward, Fore Sam? Do me a favour. I told the truth - and you
couldn't handle it. It wasn't a stupid post at all. But then you wouldn't
know what was stupid if it fell down in front of you. As far as being the
stupidest person on the planet is concerned - that's you, moron, not me.
And yes, I will continue to call parents of "cured children" liars because
they are NOT CURED!! And I'll keep saying that because - unlike your
twaddle - it's true. Just for the record, I'll quote what was said and try again here - and see how my memory goes. Mind you I'm concentrating on what I said to Fore Sam, and not Googly or Joeker. Are you
calling every parent who has already cured their child a liar? I said it above - YES. Yup, put
your reply on your site so nobody can comment, coward. Actually other people CAN comment - just not Fore Sam! They just need an account. I'm not on
any spectrum, Phil. Oh yes he is! He has all the traits of an Aspie - including black and white thinking! I think it
would do Phil some good if he was caught and cured. I think it would do some good if Fore Sam was caught and re-programmed out of this BS line. Then again he is so fixated with hating Autism he'd have a meltdown if he was pushed through that! He is one of us after all! I'll be
waiting to hear from some people in Australia who may want to help him. That's a massive bluff and I know it. He knows no one in Australia who is in a position to do anything - in fact the only Aussie that I'm aware of on that blog who would be even remotely associated with him would be that blabbermouth Informer (who had been rather quiet at that point I noticed!). Anyway, in Australia there is no such thing as mercury poisoning because here we are smart enough to know it's BS! Phil is
following the Neuroinsane guidelines of hiding in the safety of his own
blog that doesn't allow comments so he can pretend he is not screwed up
beyond belief with nobody to slap him into reality. Slap me?? Oh bravo, Fore Sam! Physical violence will get you absolutely nowhere - and drives your credibility down even further than it already is! As I said above, I did allow comments on the Wiki. I don't allow them on the AS blog because I want the comments here. Hey Phil, I
deleted both of your comments because you keep insulting sane people. A
screwball like yourself needs to learn when to shut up. Take your own advice, idiot! I altered the quote note above adding "modded out" and I won't bother responding there anymore because obviously he prefers something he can handle. I don't insult sane people. I insult the insane who deserve it (like him) and the liars (parents who believe chelation can turn a child on the spectrum into an NT) because when they close their ears, it's polite to shout! Especially when what I'm shouting is the TRUTH! I don't see
gray areas when it comes to neuroinsanity because there aren't any. You're
all loopy. Everything any of you say is insane. You're all too dumb to be
reasoned with. That first sentence is a weak cover for his own Spectrum traits. There ARE grey areas. The people that handle those are the NT's who support our cause because - unlike Fore Sam - they take the time to make the effort to understand, and then try to help us make those grey areas as black and white as possible. Mercury poisoning is (at best or worst depending on your point of view) a grey area. I've made it as black and white as I can with my article on it here - and when I have time I will be adding to it. That's the act of a smart person. The dumbo is Fore Sam, and for that reason he can't be reasoned with himself. BTW Phil, I
do have some friends in Australia. Maybe one of them will look you up just
to let me know if you're as much of a nut case in person as you are on the
internet. More bluffing. He knows no one. I know it, and deep down he knows it as well. He's a coward, pure and simple. And Joeker gave it to him as well which was a positive sign. FORE SAM THE
PRESIDENT He'd be wasting his time - because Australia (unlike the US) have the matter well in hand. And that is that ASD's can not be cured. Anyone who speaks to any department here about curing ASD's will be either laughed at, or be hung up on in their ear. America is under greater threat from President Fore Sam than Australia is from Prime Minister Phil! Of course,
people like Phil will have to be kept under surveillance for the safety of
society. Fore Sam is the one who will be kept under surveillance. Because he is a child abuser and a liar. And if he wants us locked up - he should lock himself up as well because he is one of us. I'm sure
Timelord would vote for me if he were a citizen since he desperately needs
a cure. You can tell the AFFers I'll hold a Cabinet position open for one
of them if they vote for me. I don't need a cure. Never have and never will. And no one in their right mind will be prepared to hold a Cabinet position in a Fore Sam government - unless they were as crazy as he is and a part of the real cult. The cult of panic stricken lazy good for nothing layabouts who won't accept the reality of ASD's. THE ASD
CULTURE Asperger's
is not an identity, a way of life, a race. This HAS to
be addressed. You are a fool, Anon - and I'm not surprised you stayed
anonymous because that comment is discriminatory to say the LEAST!! AS IS
an identity! It IS a way of life!! Therefore it has the same rights as a
race does. After all, that's why the United Nations declarations on both
have been made in the same terms!! We are individuals with rights, and
people like you hold us back! We have provided the world with many things,
from the earliest forms of technology in the 19th century through to the
computers we enjoy today! The majority of people who came up with these
advances were and are ASPIES!! It is a
neurological disorder At least
you have the sense to call it correctly in this case, and not a disease
like Fore Sam would! And note - the disorder is a part of us as being
black is for Aborigines. You are the one who needs treatment - or rather
education in tolerance for people who are DIFFERENT! Here's the nonsense Fore Sam spouted in reply; I allowed
Phil's comment because Phil has been misinformed about the cause of
Asperger's. Phil does not mean to insult anyone, it's the Asperger's
talking, just pretend it's a friend who had one too many beers and will be
sober in the morning. The only difference here is that Phil will never
sober up unless we can deprogran him from the insanity he has learned from
scoundrels who like seeing poisoned people suffer. I think I'm being very
tolerant of your insults, Phil. I understand your diminished capacity to
reason and I pray that you will be cured someday soon. And then he added the following a little later; Besides
having brain damage misnamed Asperger's, Phil believes that professional
wrestling is real. He is the naivest of the naive. He falls for every
stupid piece of propaganda from Neuroinsanity. His parents must be
horrible people for not trying to help him. That last sentence had the proverbial steam coming out of my ears let me tell you!! This post was also let through, and I did address a couple of other posts from other people so here is the edited version directed at the above two quotes; Phil has
been misinformed about the cause of Asperger's. It was my next post after more nonsense poured out that was modded out. Again, I've edited it to respond to Fore Sam only; The proof
that this is the only way to approach the problem lies in the fact that no
person who has been cured of any ASD asks to revert to their former damged
condition. That's because they are still ASD and always will be. No one has ever been cured of it and never will be. That includes your son, and you. No matter
how you try to explain to someone with brain damage that they have brain
damage, they will never understand until the brain damage is repaired.
That's why we need to round them all up and cure them for their own good
and the good of society. That's NOT brain damage! Get out of YOUR bubble of denial and admit that your one of us, moron! And even if it was - brain damage can ONLY be repaired by brain surgery. Not chelation! But it's not, and you are showing your intolerance to a different world that will inevitably harm your son and yourself. You'll never get what you want (an NT son) so bloody well give it up NOW! Oh what's the use - like the guy in Fox's story (which I won't repeat here), you won't listen will you? A fellow Aspie through and through. So very disappointing. Idiot. CALLING IN
WELFARE He would
have my son taken away because I'd like to help him revert to the way he
was born....normal. He wasn't born normal - no child is born normal because there's no such thing. He was born with the Autistic gene - as Fore Sam himself was. I saw that
Mr Gluyas had taken a poll to see who favored kicking me in the nuts. I responded to this below. I think
these people must be jealous because their parents are all too inept to
help them. Pot, Kettle, Black! Fore Sam is the inept one! I'll bet
most of them come from broken homes with drunks and drug addicts for
parents. It seems that most of these people are teens with the exception
of Mr Gluyas. So, one would have to discount their outrage as just
youthful ignorance. These kids can't help it that they have idiots for
parents. It's not their fault that nobody ever cared enough about them to
try to help them recover from their disability. That's a reflection on the membership of Aspies For Freedom, and I reprinted that for a reaction on the AFF forum. It's a lot of nonsense, and a pathetic cheap shot. I have your
statements here so that I can prosecute you for making false
statements. Go right ahead, Fore Sam! To do that you have to prove that mercury poisoning equals Autism, and that will fail big time, so the case will go up in smoke! I did respond to this verbage, along with some of the other rubbish that was posted by others and I'll put the lot even though a lot of it isn't directed at Fore Sam - and I've edited Fore Sam's real name out; Lisa said,
"The degree to which he obsesses over you is quite alarming, even for an
aspie." And Fore Sam obsessing over the myth of mercury poisoning isn't
alarming, Lisa? He's got bigger problems than I have - because he isn't
coping at all! What I said was the truth. Googly, Sam IS ill - and Fore
Sam is NOT treating him correctly. That - in my book - makes him a danger
to Sam. And I am not over reacting. Chelation is not a cure for Autism. It
only helped Sam because his intestines were blocked with heavy metals
because of what he was putting in his mouth. Nothing whatsoever to do with
injections. The improvement in his behaviour came from the removal of the
sensory overload (the pain). The point is that Fore Sam wants an NT son.
He's not going to get it no matter what he does, and the sooner he gets
that through his thick skull the better. And shut up, Informer - or
whatever your real name is!! I recorded the post just in case it didn't get through, but it did. There were responses from others, but I'll concentrate on Fore Sam; Lisa, I
only get a big head when I see pictures of Phil's wife. The guy in
Australia who stalks Phil for me sends them to me. Hey Phil, I hope you
noticed that other people want to mentioned in your writing. If your lucky
Lisa, Phil will add you to his "Enemies" list. It's a hilarious bunch of
lunacy but Phil states at the top of the page that it's deadly serious.
So, I guess we have to take Phil seriously LOL. Be careful though, Lisa.
Phil will compare you to Hitler if you make him angry by helping an
autistic child. You know, this mockery and pechant for lying (particularly about the first two sentences) is going to end up biting Fore Sam on the rear end. And the sooner the better! That third sentence is appalling grammar as well! The Aspie enemies list is there to demonstrate what NOT to do to an Aspie. Everyone there is an example of people who don't treat the inherent and permanent aspects of ASD's with proper respect, and it is an essential service to provide. Laughing at that is the same as laughing at those two reporters for revealing the Watergate scandal, or at the people who revealed the registers the Nazi's kept of the atrocities they perpetrated. I addressed the second sentence and the last sentence in my reply, and this post was my last for now; You love
lying don't you, (deleted)? Absolutely adore it. Is it your mistress? And then; Hey Phil, I
checked with SS. They got your letter and forwarded it to the men in the
white coats in Australia. Watch out for people carrying nets, Phil. I addressed this in reply in the same final post; Ah the liar
strikes again! Aside from the fact that there are no men in white coats
here. Oh you didn't want to hear that did you? SS? That's appropriate!
LOL And finally; Yuh phil,
where's the foresam updates?!! And I want to be at the top of the enemies
list!!! I've earned it and I demand it!!! Translation
- "I WANT MY DUMMY BACK, DADDY!" You obviously need to be sent to your
room, little boy! Act your (beep!)ing age, Fore Sam. Your petulance shows
just how mad and dangerous to your son you are. Completely and utterly
pathetic. You don't deserve to be a father, or probably even a husband!
Married after 40? I got married when I was 27! What was YOUR problem, huh?
Couldn't find a woman who could cope with your meglomania? Lisa observed that I should learn to laugh. There is nothing funny about Fore Sam - at all, except when he makes a complete idiot of himself by lying through his back teeth about unrelated issues in order to cover up his own stupidity - when in fact it has the opposite affect. And I've said this before - the list of Aspie Enemies is chronological. So unless Fore Sam can get himself a time machine and get me upset before Roylion and Bunsen Burner did in October 2004, he's not going to get his wish. I'll have the nappies on stand by for his next temper tantrum - or should I say ASD MELTDOWN! Fore Sam responded to my blog posting thus; Don't you
understand that the Omnibus case is about money not about curing autism.
It makes no difference what happens there. All it will prove is that one
set of lawyers had better tricks up their sleeves than the other set of
lawyers. When the case is as obvious as it is, there will be no need for tricks for those who will win (the respondents). All the tricks will come from the petitioners, and they will fail. Do you
think the kids who have already been cured will revert to being autistic
if the drug company lawyers win? There are no cured kids so that's a moot point. {{Q|Do you
think anyone will stop chelating their kids because of what happens in a
courtroom? Yes, should the decision state categorically that Autism is NOT caused by mercury poisoning - setting a precedent that could not be overturned due to the overwhelming scientific proof that opposes the mercury poisoning myth. Those that don't will find themselves subject to a visit from welfare as well. Sory Phil,
you'll still be out to lunch no matter what happens there. But, Keep
writing those blog updates because I need the laughs. Fore Sam won't be laughing when the Omnibus fails, and it hits him that he's wrong and chelation is doing nothing to help his son in the way that he wants it to. ON JOEKER'S
BLOG Phil, You
admitted that you lie about professional wrestling on your blog. Why is it
OK for a liar to have a blog? Along with the fact that's it's not a feasible or correct act to engage in. You don't
see newspapers getting sued over letters to the editor, nitwit. That was from memory, which I hope I'm right about (my memory's pretty reliable - but it would be worth checking). I have some
extra ALA, Phil if you'd like to try and add some IQ points. On that particular thread, Fore Sam ran off like the coward that he is. I also asked him what rank he was in the armed forces and he is yet to reply to that. Elsewhere the issue of me calling in welfare was discussed and Fore Sam eventually came in and uttered the following; Phil, I
just read your comment from 6/12/07. ND's are a pack of lying scoundrels.
That's why I treat them like (beep!), they deserve it!!! Your just too
damn stupid to understand that everything you have to say about autism is
wrong. This was in reply to commentary I made about the justified anger of the Neurodiverse (ND). And I responded thus; We are not
lying, (deleted). You are. I fail to see the point of repeating myself yet
again. I'd let you live in your state of denial, but Sam is being hurt by
your histrionics - that is why I am fighting you with the truth. The real
truth. The Omnibus case result will bear us out - when it is lost. Fore Sam also made comments about some things that Joeker said including a reflection on me; I have no
hope that Phil has the brain power to gain this understanding And treating us as a joke and a plaything is completely and utterly reprehensible. Fore Sam didn't respond directly to me, preferring to address Joeker, and I got him again - well and truly; It will be
time for me to stop when every parent knows the truth about thimerosal. That last comment of Fore Sam's is his whole argument in a nutshell - and Joeker got it right calling his attitude akin to that of the Klu Klux Klan. Fore Sam shot back the following nonsense with my responses; Phil, Is
Amanda Baggs telling the truth? You know, from now on if I post on his blog or Joeker's I might just treat him like a child. Especially in light of this flagrant lie; Phil, My IQ
is over 200. If you had the ability to listen, you'd be on your way to
being cured now. As Joeker rightly observed, that would make him smarter than Einstein - which is impossible! But he insisted; Phil, I'm
not lying about anything. I'm beaten by the likes of you Bozo's, LOL. He repeated the claim after I supported Joeker's challenge to behave like a rational adult, and he also referred to some stats that Brad Handley (the Generation Rescue founder if I recall correctly) had expoused, and that Kevin Leitch had torn apart - and quite rightly. He also admitted that he hadn't put Sam in special ed - which I was quick to round on. Im all the
arguments I've had with you and other neurodiverse people, I have won
every point. And he still wouldn't quit, enforcing another response from me; I'm not
lying about my IQ, Phil. Special ed.
is good for retarded people but is a waste of time for autistics. And I got in the "treat him like a child" comment at the end. Ah,
th..th..the..th..th..the..that's all folks! :) With respect to Porky Pig! Fore Sam did ask whether or not I was in special ed myself (which I wasn't) and he also asked when I'll be in the Autism Hub. That's none of his business but he'll find out when I am. The re-jig was a key because I had to get the Fore Sam material off my AS blog first. ASPIES FOR
FREEDOM If I was
depressed and met some guy who told me there was a chance I could be cured
and would then be able to fit in better socially, have friends, get laid,
etc, I'd be glad to hear about it. It certainly wouldn't cause me to stick
a knife in my heart. This was in response to my statement on AFF that if any 14 or 15 year old teenager researching ASD's as they had just been DXed and were still struggling with it - and came across this blog they would be pushed over the edge and commit suicide. Fore Sam is concentrating on the "positives" of his blog, of which there are none. Seeing all the abuse aimed at ASD people will be what the youngster will see first - not any so-called help. That's how much Fore Sam understands about psychology. That's to be expected because he wants nothing to do with psychiatry given his pathetic line that he holds about disease. It's
obvious to rational people that I don't hate anyone with autism. Yes you do, Fore Sam. Aside from me, there's Amanda Baggs for a start - and Joeker. You are scared of us because we represent the truth. People
with Asperger's who read this should ask questions instead of following
the stupidity of Phil Gluyas. I might just be able to help you help
yourselves. We do ask questions, idiot. And you don't have the answers because you have no idea what you are dealing with. I have most of the answers, because I have done the research. I have lived this thing called Aspergers and I continue to do so because that is who I am. Now we
have a loopy loon calling it a psychological beating to try to cure
autism. It is psychological beating to try and create an NT child out of an ASD one - for one simple reason. It's impossible. As for the following mythical telephone conversation!; Operator: "Hello, Australian Ministry
of Lunatics, may I help you" Honestly, this idiot is living in a might big fantasy world! Australian Ministry of Lunatics?? There's no such thing! And besides, health matters of that variety are handled by the states. Anyway, I can safely say right now that the conversation would more likely go like this; Operator: "Hello, Department of Human
Services, may I help you" Reason? Australia has rejected the false theory of mercury poisoning already. I am known to the Department, not as a lunatic but as an Aspie who has been in touch with them for help with peripheral issues. I am also known to the government in Canberra through my communications with various people over many years. And not as a lunatic like certain New Hampshire based politicians see Fore Sam. Now he's
about to be tossed out of AFF which is a fruit loop haven itself. I hope
Phil doesn't see this as bullying and use it as an excuse to bring a
machine gun to the next wrestling match. On the contrary, I was nowhere near being kicked out. Wilky was closer (and she was a user here, but she has now been blocked until she apologises) because she accused Amy - one of the owners - of being naive about me. Amy locked the thread in question after I PMed her about it, and she did suggest that I ignore her. Which I was already doing anyway. And I think Fore Sam is more likely to take a machine gun to a wrestling show! I better
call the Australian Ministry of Lunatics again just in case they don't kep
tabs on the AFF forums. I better call the Department of Human Services again, and the others while I'm about it! It looks
like the AFF nitwits are not very proud of some of their threads so they
are hiding them from the public. They probably don't want Phil making them
look any more idiotic than he already has. On the contrary, they moved it so as not to give you public fodder to continue your garbage on, Fore Sam! I wasn't being idiotic (certain other members were, but that's beside the point). For that reason I am now trying to avoid talking about Fore Sam on the public boards. Not easy let me tell you! Visiting
AFF gives me the creeps. It's quite a collection of goofballs. The only
reason I go there at all is because people keep advising me that Looney
Tunes Phil is spreading his paranoid delusions about me there. Also, it
was fun to watch Droopy put you all in your place before some cowardly
moderator deleted all of her words. If anyone is suffering from paranoid delusions, it's Fore Sam. And Droopy never put AFF in it's place at all - and for the record her posts were deleted as standard procedure for anyone ducking a previous ban. They would have stayed otherwise. THE UPDATE
REACTION AND BILL'S POST Oh but sane people DO laugh at them, Fore Sam! And you're as jealous as heck because you can't see the joke! I just
read a little of it. I'm thankful my kid isn't as screwed up as poor
Phil. I'm not screwed up at all. Sam is - but that's not his fault. It's his father's. Both because it was his genes that made Sam that way to start with, and then he worsened it with the way he's been treating him! It's
amazing what lengths these psychopaths will go to to attack me for
opposing their insanity. And, the way they attack autistic adults who
oppose their lunacy raelly makes me think Neuroinsanity is a cult that
should be forcibly shut down. Then Phil can be forcibly cured. Oh RAELLY?? That reminds me of a strong southern accent a la Penelope Pitstop! LMAO! The real cult is the curebie cult. That's the one that should be forcibly shut down. And meglomaniacs like Fore Sam either be re-educated, or if they won't be take their kids off them and get a vasectomy. Phil
might be 43 but I'm afraid his mental age will always be about 6. I have
more stimulating arguments with my 6 year old daughter. I'm 42 (at the time of this post) just for the record! And the rest of that is a lie. I'm driving him up the wall and he's refusing to admit it. If my mental age was 6 I wouldn't be able to do the things that I can do - such as umpire Aussie Rules for example! When Mr.Fix-It posted here is what Fore Sam said in reply (the posts can be found under "Bill Thomas" in the Fore Sam Enemies listings); Phil
keeps telling me I'm hurting my son by trying to cure his autism. And you are! Phil is
too ignorant to appreciate the fact that mercury in vaccines damaged my
son's brain. It didn't! And you are the ignorant one, Fore Sam! He is
stuck in a different era where there was no cure for autism and he's
making a real ass out of himself by persisting with his obsolete drivel.
He is perpetuating ignorance, harming himself in the process and I won't
put up with his stupidity. And I'm not putting up with yours, Fore Sam! Because it's based on panic stricken meglomania and refuses to acknowledge that Autism always has been and always will be impossible to cure. If I
smash his self-esteem so that he learns to listen, he might help rid
himself of his disability. Smashing one's self esteem does not enforce anything - except suicide and a lack of self worth. That what a bully does, and that's what Fore Sam is - a bully. By legal definition I am disabled, and it is permanent. I have accepted this about myself and I will not tolerate anyone trying to smash the self worth I have developed for myself. His pride
in having Asperger's needs to be smashed since it is a hindrance to his
well being and that of all people with Asperger's. It looks like it would
also be a good idea for you to shut up and start listening to those of us
who know how to treat autism. That last comment was of course directed at Bill. There IS treatment for ASD's - it's called tolerance and special education. Psychology. As a child there may be bio medical options, but that entirely depends on what (if Dr.Good is right) triggered the dormant gene. But it still has to be backed up with psychology. My pride as an Aspie will NEVER be smashed. Anyone who tries will be smashed back. After that, some anon accused me effectively of hypocrisy by claiming that I was fighting for my right to work and yet I wouldn't because of "slavery" (glorified slavery is the exact phrase I used). I wasn't going to let that go unchallenged, and luckily it was let through. I was answering the question as to why I would write that; Because
it would kill me psychologically, that's why. And I meant it. I was too close to a nervous breakdown for comfort when I left Australia Post. And thanks to the Defence Department experience I now know that it is legal for an employer to ignore my needs. The anon had a go at me for sticking a psychological knife into Fore Sam for using "bio med" to treat his son - which he isn't (chelating isn't bio med). And as I said in reply; He isn't
helping him! That's the whole point of my attack! He's holding him
back! Someone called Maxima meanwhile accused me of making an excuse not to work and wondered why he couldn't claim it, or anyone else for that matter. He also accused me of refusng to participate in the work force. I don't refuse. I am simply not allowed to work because of what working requires (a lack of routine and no autonomy). I went to Maxima's blog and explained that, but the post was deleted because the fool obviously didn't want to hear the truth. Of course there's the CMO report to take into account as well. BITS AND
PIECES I'm already married, idiot! Rachel isn't soft, she told it like it was as did Kelly Tranter at about the same time. More garbage showed up from an anon who posted about a thread at the All Aussie Wrestling forum, claiming that I stalk everyone on that thread daily (I don't because I don't need to). And none of them have my contact details anyway so that won't help! Droopy wanted to see this Wiki but a Google search went back to the HA blog which I thought was very funny. I think you can't get Wiki results from Google because of some dispute - but I'm not sure about that. Of course Fore Sam gets in his usual; You're
not missing anything. Phil's even wackier on his site than he is on AFF I would expect that from Mister Master of Wackyland with his head so far up his rear end I can't describe it. Droopy, incidentally, did eventually find this place thanks to Fore Sam linking her, but he didn't get the reaction he wanted from her because she was sort of complimentary about the article on her in a way! Calling it tame by comparison to what I've been saying on Aspies for Freedom. Of course! Because I keep this place safe from the likes of Fore Sam, and the likes of those I am having trouble with on AFF. That fell flat on it's face, but it was interesting that she didn't see the influence of my comment that ''Fore Sam is pandering to her because he knows that Droopy proves him right''. If she sees this update, read this. Fore Sam is pandering to her because he knows that Droopy proves him right - that there is nothing whatsoever positive about ASD's. And by the way, Droopy, I'm married. JUST FOR THE HECK OF
IT TOP JOBS
FOR PHIL: # As I have a formal DX of Aspergers, plus a note
saying I am not medically fit to work (for the public service - but if I
can't work for them I can't work for anyone) I am not a free loader. And I
wouldn't want to be either because that's dishonest. THE MODDED
OUT POST Watson,
Phil Gluyas wrote a long response disagreeing with you but it was too
idiotic to publish. The fact that Phil disagrees with you means you are
correct in everything you said since Phil hasn't got anything right
yet. I've got more right than Fore Sam ever could. Anyway - here's what I said, with Watson's quote in orange and my response in pale yellow. Watson, you're an idiot. That she retreated into fantasy deliberately. Can that be true? Yes - as a self protection measure. ASD people do that all the time when what's going on around them becomes too much and they don't have the energy to fight. That she had difficulties with receptive language, and she didn't always know what she was saying. Can that be true? Yes - and that includes "gifted" students by the way! It is possible to be gifted and yet still have the above problem! That she began being sexually abused in adolescence. Can that be true? Not if she was sexually abused by her brother for years, and that the abuse stopped when she went to college. It can be if the abuse she suffered at college and beyond was worse! What is PTSD? That her learning to type helped her to communicate and that the words that people she communicated with used, helped her to learn which words to use herself. Can that be true? Of course! And did it occur to you, Watson, that she was experimenting on Google? And was she successful in her own eyes? You might think she was, but it's possible that she did not. Remember that this was before her ASD diagnosis and in all likelihood she was still under the influence of the schizophrenia drugs. That she regressed in infancy. Can that be true? That rather depends on went she was first abused by her brother. That definitely would have caused a sensory overload and a regression. That her pretend play "in part" got her labelled psychotic. Can that be true? Of course it can - by quacks who wouldn't use the DSM-IV properly and get the DX right to start with, completely obsessed with the Eugene Blueler work and ignoring Kanner's in the process! That she went to college and then to special ed. Is that true? Yes, but she was "mainly in special ed for therapeutic stuff". The impression she gives is that she had regressed to a point where she needed to be in a special education class, and yet at the time she was looking forward to going back to college to become a special ed teacher. So? What's your point, Watson? At the time she wouldn't have seen the need (I'm assuming this was before her ASD DX) and special ed schools wouldn't have wanted a DXed schizophrenic around so they made her uncomfortable and hence forth she wanted out of there. That she was forced to play "crazy" by psychiatric professionals, and that she gave them what she thought they wanted out of her. Can that be true? Well, no one was making her share her psychiatric experiences - voices, hallucinations, delusions, violence, paranoia - with members of multiple online support forums. Oh yes they were - by getting the DX wrong and drugging her up so that things like this actually did happen to her! In the end she played crazy to get them off her back! That she tried to force-fit herself into a lot of autism stereotypes she heard about. Can that be true? Absolutely NOT! Why would you force fit, when it fits comfortably? She was being herself at last and any usage of stereotypes was to counter the pathetic professionals and their schizophrenia line that had set back her development by goodness knows how much! I only wish Amanda would do the same. (go live in Hawaii and never be heard from again) You are the one who should do that, Watson. And take (deleted) with you. Amanda will be around because she is who she says she is - Autistic. And there is another reason why she'll stay around. A slandering woman called Droopy. Amanda can't go anywhere until she is properly dealt with - starting with a simple (and this is me saying this - not Amanda) note; Droopy - SHUT THE HECK UP! You are making all of us look bad, and (deleted) loves it which is why he is keeping you around here! And just quickly, Watson - Droopy was banned from AFF not just because she is LFA, but because she had been banned previously for being rude and upsetting and angering virtually every member of AFF - and not acknowledging it. I also added a note that I would record the post in case it was modded out and I'm glad I did. Watson did try to guess at what I'd spoken of based on what I'd said about the situation on Joeker's blog. He claimed that Amanda's DX of schizophrenia was right (it wasn't and Watson is not a doctor so he can not make any such claim - unless he's one of the quacks who can't tell the bloody difference!), and he also claimed that what Amanda had said about her life didn't add up. It wouldn't to someone who doesn't understand the situation as a whole and just refuses to adjust accordingly. He also asked why I changed my tune about Amanda "innocently imitating" and "never imitating". I got some cast iron info that corrected my first assertion. Watson also observed that problems with communication is common across the Spectrum (there he's quite right), but then he tried to put Droopy on the same level as those of us at the higher end of the Spectrum. That was wrong. Droopy's communication skills are far worse than either mine or Amanda's because she is much more careless. And when she speaks her mind in the way that she did on AFF - that was rude and offensive. And she refuses to accept that she was and learn from it. That is the lack of intelligence I was speaking of. Droopy's got a unique style of writing all right. It'll get boring before too long when you eventually see it's the same thing over and over again. And I don't owe Droopy an apology. She owes us an apology. And the article is staying because it's true. And I NEVER called Droopy a "tard" by the way! I called her a few other things, but not that! As I said above, she should....you know. THE SLANDER
GOES TOO FAR Amongst
the drivel was Phil calling the video "Sexy". Now I don't know about about
you guys, but one the video was in no way sexy, and more disturbingly, it
is of a 16 year old autistic child and the comments are from a 42 year old
married man. Absolutely furious I posted a reply, and was foolish enough not to record it. And Fore Sam modded it out with the following heinous reflection; Phil had
some comment about Kurai being sexy with the thong but I didn't think it
was appropriate. I think he's a dirty old man. Outraged now, I roared in with this - and this one was let through; I said NO
SUCH THING, (deleted)! That is slander and you'll pay for it if you don't
withdraw that pathetic and completely false assertion INSTANTLY!! Fore Sam invited me to repeat what I said, which I did and this time I recorded it - only for Fore Sam to mod it out again, calling it off topic and; If you
can stop fantasizing about that 16 year old girl long enough to say
something constructive, I may publish it. I repeatedly tried to get it posted, until Fore Sam threw it onto Joeker's blog which switched the battle over there partly. That angered me because I hadn't posted there for ages as a result of my dispute with Joeker. Meanwhile back on Fore Sam's blog, Cunning Lingus came back and repeated a couple of his slanderous remarks and also published my mobile phone number. I quickly changed it upon seeing that. Fore Sam quickly jumped on the accusations because they were consistent with his nonsense about Kurai-Gaka. I won't repeat what he said of course, but needless to say my printer got some work. But matters had already gone way too far. Some anonymous coward contacted the police and reported me, and they paid me a visit on the morning of August 21 just when I was about to head out for my usual Tuesday trip to the city. I was furious! I showed them everything that led up to the complaint and we discussed the matter - after I talked them out of taking me in because it was on my computer that the real story lay. I was advised to make a change to the Kurai-Gaka article (which I did) and they left without any further action. It was clear they were annoyed at the false report. And I wasted no time. That day was wrecked and I was lucky enough to get an appointment with the lawyer who'd helped me with the stalking issue. I arranged with him to send a warning letter to Fore Sam. I didn't tell him about the police visit because I didn't see the need at that point - because the slander was enough. And Fore Sam anticipated it as though he figured I wouldn't do anything. I suppose
Phil will want to sue me over that. It must have been my phone calls to
the Australian Ministry of Lunatics He wishes! I'll give him this - he wouldn't have been anonymous. That's how I know it wasn't him. Besides, he wouldn't have the courage to follow up on his threats. I have no such qualms. The warning letter was dated August 28 and sent on or around that time, instructing him to apologise and retract the accusation within 28 days of receipt - both by return mail, and on his blog. I expected a message on the blog, and it came on September 8 after he got the letter presumably on the previous day. He addressed the content accurately and correctly identified the Kurai-Gaka commentary as the issue. From there - his memory failed him, or he lied through his teeth (take your pick). If I
remember correctly, Phil tried to weasel out of the criticism by claiming
the video was sexy but not the girl. I said neither. I stated that the comment was a quote from the video ("Jane"'s words - not mine). Anyone who watched the video first before reading that comment would have realised that. When the police visited they did advise me to make the comment a direct quote if that's where it came from (I did show them the video as well) - which as I said I did. As I read
some drivel about all of this, there was only one person through all of
this bull(beep!) discussion who found the video "sexy", that being Phil
Gluyas. I repeat - I NEVER said the video OR "Jane" were sexy. So again - he is in effect repeating his allegation despite the warning from Philip Lynch. And Fore Sam knew that as well because it was the first thing I said when he posted the message intended for his blog on Joeker's - and that was on August 17! There's plenty more where that came from but that's staying in storage for now and I'll explain why in a moment. I never
suspected Phil would react so wackily as to find some nitwit lawyer to
actually pursue this. You know what that says to me? Fore Sam is unable to speak outside his own experience and society. And culture - which would explain why he refuses to embrace the Autistic Culture. Australia is a different country with different laws. I might have had trouble getting help in the US if I lived there, but it depends on a number of things. The point is, under Australian Law (which is relevant) Fore Sam defamed me. That's what he didn't realise. I'm
sorely tempted to file a countersuit for all of the insane ranting Phil
has done on his website concerning how I treat my son, something that Phil
has no knowledge of. Go right ahead, Fore Sam! I'm not scared of a lawsuit from you. I have picked up your words and used them against you. Something you do all the time - especially to Amanda Baggs. If you want me to correct anything you'd better provide the details of what you are doing! And what you have done - and more importantly what you HAVEN'T done (THAT is the key!) I could
also charge Phil with harrassment for all of the anonymous and idiotic
comments he has left on my website. He can't prove that - even if he went to Google for the IP's because I only ever posted on his blog anonymously once (it's on the other quotes pages after the rest of the anons). And that's a fact. So he has no case there. I could
add in defamation too for his various untrue rantings about me on various
websites. He's going to find that hard to prove as well. Everything I have said anywhere about Fore Sam is true, and I will back it up should it go to court. And by the way - it will be heard here and not in the US. due to
the fact that he can dish out all sorts of garbage but can't take it when
it is returned HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! Now if that's not the PERFECT example of the pot calling the kettle black I'm a libertarian! He's the one that can't take it when I dish it out at him! The difference is I know which lines not to cross. Fore Sam has no idea! Phil,
I apologize for making you look like more of a nitwit than you already
seem to be. Mr Lynch, I hope that's good enough for you. If you want a
handwritten apology, you'll have to agree to accept my letter COD. I'm not
wasting one dime on this wacko. Speaking for myself - no, this is not good enough. Especially due to the repeat of the allegation above as previously stated. And the demands did include a written reply (it doesn't have to be hand written, just as long as it has his signature on it) and trying to place the COD proviso on it means that the demands are not being met. I'll alter this if Phil's advice to me is different - but as it stands now (as I can assume Fore Sam got the warning letter on Friday September 7) he has until Friday October 5 to mail a proper and unreserved apology. Given the time the mail takes, using this as a guide that would be a week and a half) I will wait until Friday October 19. If I have not received anything in writing by then - I commence legal action in the appropriate court (likely the Victorian Supreme Court). Meanwhile; I'm happy
to report that the Australian Ministry of Lunatics is doing their job very
well. I've been in touch with this agency several times now to report the
possibly dangerous delusional behavior of Phil Gluyas. It looks like they
sent the local cops to visit Phil to let him know that they are aware of
his perverse behavior. I know the reason already, and it had nothing to do with this mythical ministry. It had to do with an anonymous tip off. Phil
doesn't believe that the Ministry of Lunatics even exists. They try to
keep their activities secret to avoid confrontations with lunatics like
Phil. A friend who used to work for the CIA gave me their phone number. He
agreed that watching a loon like Phil may help avert a catastrophe. One
never knows when a crazed paranoid nut is going to go postal. There's a catastrophe already occuring right now. In Fore Sam's own home. The destruction of a 10 year old boy with Autism for life. I refused to take this thing seriously, but I guess it's about time I spoke to the Department about this - and have a laugh with them about it, while expressing my concern at this idiot's meglomania. Of course they'll be told about the lawsuit as well. I'll repeat it - I know the Ministerial structure. There is no such Ministry - even within ASIS (our version of the CIA). Fore Sam then picked up part of a dispute on Aspies for Freedom. In it I effectively called him out on his sock puppet - Watson. Well it's my opinion that Watson is a sock puppet of Fore Sam anyway. Since Watson has been attacking the issues of the vaccines (and all but calling for their complete abolition) Fore Sam has been silent on the issue - preferring to post rants only. Very suspicious. This guy
needs some serious help when he demands an apology from someone just
because they don't share his view that I am the reincarnation of Adolph
Hitler, scheming to destroy all people with Asperger's. It was more than that - aside from the fact that the comparison was valid. The person concerned refused to listen to me and was insulting me in their response - particularly one time. Don't forget Fore Sam's favourite line to Aspies - "We should all be rounded up and forcibly cured". Facism at it's best. Some of
the people on AFF who maintain some semblance of sanity are quite
disillusioned with Phil. I am of the opinion that a couple of them are NT's and not Aspies. Notwithstanding - that issue is in hand. I hope. I hope
the Australian Ministry of Lunatics locks him up soon and cures him.
People like Phil should not be allowed to suffer. Neither should Sam, but Fore Sam continues to let him! And in Australia - no one is locked up unless they commit a crime. And there is NO cure for Aspergers Syndrome. What needs to be cured is the intolerance - which Fore Sam suffers from in bucket loads. Hence his meglomania. If anyone should be locked up, it's him. Whether or not he can be cured of his meglomania is something I can not answer. AND OFF WE
GO TO COURT I'm
picturing Phil sitting in the witness stand rolling the ball bearings
around while the Australian Ministry of Lunatics readies his net I'm picturing the court room withOUT Fore Sam, and the judge passing judgment in my favour because he didn't file an appearance as he didn't take this seriously. I'll also address a few things the cowardly anonymous posters said; So, he
plans on suing you in Australia via the Hague Convention? Nope - no need thanks to the Gutnick/Dow Jones precedent. Furthermore, if it is a defamation claim, wouldn't
Phil have to prove some type of damages and prove that people actually
beleived what was said? Yes and I have that proof. Damage to me and my functioning level, and the anonymous tip off fool believed it. So did the police otherwise they would never have visited me to begin with. As long
as it is opinion, (name deleted) - you are in the clear Not when it causes damage he's not. Far from it! Obviously, the police never took him in and booked
him so they did not beleive the statements - hence, no defamation - no
damages - zilch, nada, no case! YES case - because they wanted to take me in for questioning. I talked them out of it because the proof of what I was saying was true was on my computer. Once a person or persons believe - I have causation. If I can talk them out of it that makes no difference to the case of causation. I prepared a special page and left an instruction on the top for no one else to edit it. I have kept it and it can be viewed at the link at the bottom of this page under "Statement". I then went into Fore Sam's blog and this is what I said after I first quoted Fore Sam thus; Since I
can not converse with Phil on hids Wiki site, there is no point in my
going there. That is
not true and never has been. The discussion tab of the Contact Page is
free to edit by anyone without logging in. But having said that, I have
created a special page for this to be sorted out on. The instructions to
other people (users and others) is to leave the page alone. I am doing
this because this blog has shown it's bias for hiding posts and so forth.
Nothing can be hidden on a Wiki without deleting the whole page so I am
unable to hide your comments as the history tab reveals all. My full
statement to you is there, and you can respond there. Don't log in. You
don't need to. I then linked to the page I mentioned just above and added that no one else should edit the page. But Fore Sam started making excuses; I made
one comment on your site, it was deleted and I was banned from commenting
there. Since then you have written pages of trash defaming me.(I don't
care what you say about me since your diminished capacity excuses you from
any responsibility.) I have not written one scrap of defamatory material here. It's all true, or my opinion based on what Fore Sam himself has said. If he wants to counter sue me he can go right ahead, because he has a LOT of questions to answer! The one comment that did appear here will be included in the litany of abuse leading up to the Kurai-Gaka thing. Your
terms stated that I was to apologize to you on the internet. And in writing! I did so
on this internet site and that's where any discussion will take place. I
will not go to your site. You and your lawyer made the terms but the venue
was left up to me since you didn't specify it. You will discuss it here or
nowhere. This was a desperate attempt to take control of matters, because he knew he was in trouble and he was keen to control the conversation and use his moderation button accordingly. That was partly why I wanted the conversation here because you can't hide stuff here just by deleting comments. You have to delete the page completely. And I had nothing to hide. So upon reading that he wouldn't come here; Then I'll
see you in court - unless you apologise properly as well as in writing
(withOUT COD) by October 5 as per the warning (28 days). And I mean it. If
you REALLY want to settle this - you will be the one who can show you are
a man and come to my Wiki, instead of hiding in here. Last chance. Predictably, Fore Sam tried again to retake control; If you
had an ounce of brains, you would know that any lawyer would advise you
not to discuss the case, especially not in public. The discussion was to sort the thing out without having to go to court. And keep the abuse out of it. Of course, it never happened. Per the
terms of your idiotic letter that was allegedly written by a really stupid
lawyer, I already met your ridiculous terms with my apology on this site
that was done in writing. Your demand for a handwritten, signed letter
sent to PO Box of an Employment Agency is unbelievably stupid. No, it wasn't - because I knew the apology (no matter what it was) wouldn't stay because it affected Fore Sam's credibility (in his eyes of course). The PO Box at Bakery Hill in Ballarat was not an employment agency. Fore Sam should have looked Phil Lynch up in the Australian Yellow Pages. He's there! The fear this comment gave out epitomises Fore Sam's desire to cover for his insecurities with abuse. Go ahead
and sue me, you jackass. The case has already been settled and your letter
prevents you from taking any action now. Could there possibly be a lawyer
who is that stupid as to send me a letter like that that guarantees he can
not pursue the case if you actually had one? No, the case has not been settled - at all. The letter does no such thing. It was a demand - a demand that was effectively ignored. I will be proceeding with the lawsuit. Remember
Phil, you came on my blog anonymously and began harassing me which is
against the law. Everything I've said to you, or about you since then is
by definition, self defense. Now go (beep!) yourself. Actually, I went onto the blog to defend all Aspies (see the very beginning of this part of the section on Fore Sam). If Fore Sam felt harassed by that, he needs to realise that I just one of many people who feel the same way. Everyone responds differently. My response was to fight, first on his blog, and then on here (and that fight continues). So then I made my final comment; I don't
need a lawyer to sue you now. Phil's job is done. Australian Law backs me
- not you. I'll be in touch by mail when the orders are ready. Hope you
have an up to date passport! (You had a chance to sort this all out - and
you threw it away. I can't be held responsible for that) And his last word on the blog? I won't
be coming to Australia since this case is already settled. You got your
apology so go try to convince someone else you're not insane. I've had
enough of your childish nonsense. He won't have any choice if he wants to avoid a successful lawsuit in his absence. Amazingly, when other anons made comments that I couldn't act, the mysterious Informer came in and cleared things up quite accurately - although he also commented that I was bluffing (which I'm not). He also made an observation about Fore Sam not having the time (because he has to look after Sam) or the money (same reason) to defend the case and that may freeze things up. I'll deal with that possibility when the time comes - but I have the perfect response should it get to that point. Funny - four days later, Fore Sam actually showed up on my Wiki after all! See the "Statement" link for the full conversation. Not surprisingly, it got nowhere. I have prepared the Writ, and now all I have to do is complete the Affadavit and the Particulars of Complaint. I said on the blog that I won't need a lawyer in the Supreme Court to carry on the case once I get it started. And I have already made the preliminary enquiries with the appropriate people regarding service. The trick is to get it right at both the Australian end and the American end. As I upload this, Fore Sam's time has expired. I hope to have things up and running by the end of the year - but the sooner the better. Unfortunately the whole thing relied on a number of posts, and Fore Sam's mass deletion in January 2008 put the brakes on the action. A FEW MORE
NOTES I'm laughing at this now, because I knew the warning letter was on it's way (he got it on September 7). I'm not suing Eli Lilly - because they did nothing to me. Nor did they do anything to anyone else. There are
all sorts of people who diagnosed themselves with Asperger's who claim to
speak for autistics. Most of these Aspies are simply screwed up people who
jumped on the diagnosis as an excuse for their social ineptitude and
stupidity. Phil Gluyas and David Andrews are excellent examples of both.
These simpletons do not speak for any child with autism. This insinuates that I'm self diagnosed, which I'm not. Neither is David. I'm sure that all five of the psychiatrists who confirmed my DX would take offence to Fore Sam's amateur psychiatrics. Or laugh at him (probably the latter). We can speak for children on the Spectrum, and help parents understand their children as well. Because we have been where their children are now. And a great opportunity for me to do exactly that fell into my lap at that point in time. The funny
thing about wacko Phil calling DSS is that I never heard from them. It's
pretty easy for sane people to identify wackos, even over the
telephone. Funny that, because I NEVER telephoned them! I sent an email, and it wasn't even to DSS because there wasn't an email address. I won't say who it was though - except to say the person I emailed was in Fore Sam's home town. When someone called "Mr Ed" complained about the mirror message on my Wiki, and then compared it to my commentary about Encyclopedia Dramatica here, I took a punt at a correction and believe it or not, Fore Sam let it through! The version here has Fore Sam's real name edited out; Mr.Ed -
or whatever your name is - if ANYONE wants to take any aspect of my
website to court, they are welcome to try. Unlike ED, I am quite happy to
face it. ED try to fob off responsibility which is why it's a bad example.
(deleted) is welcome to try and take action against me for that note. I
will fire back what he wrote under Kev Leitch's daughter's name, and
justify it as fair comment - which is the case for all aspects of my
website. And where's the causation hmmm? If I'm sick, that makes (deleted)
sicker. And at least my so called sickness in this respect has a
reasonable explanation. (deleted)'s does not. And maybe I should try and
find out who (deleted)'s CO was in the military and get him (or her) to
give him an order! (LMAO) In the
US, it's even legal for lunatics to say whatever they want so you're
safe. Actually, no, that's not the case at all. Especially over the Internet where if someone outside the US views something, that person's local law applies. Which of course in my case is Australian and Victorian law. The "horse" responded by trying to shift the blame to Kevin, and it got another post from me - and guess what. It was modded out of course! Mr. Ed
you type all of that from behind the cowardly guise of a screen name.
Kevin NEVER EVER used a child like (deleted) did. NEVER EVER! So don't
give me that provocation rubbish. I don't buy it, and neither does any
other person who has any regard for human decency. Kev never picked the
fight at that level. The worst Kev did was make (deleted) mad because he
told the real truth about ASD's. He's mad at me and every other person he
abuses in here for the same reason. Whether I'm a parent or not is beside
the point. I know rubbish when I see it. And remember - and you'd better
not mod this out, (deleted) - this poor excuse for a father neglected his
son for SEVEN YEARS!! And I can prove it as well. Enough said! ZAPPERS AND
THE PETITION The CIA was also mentioned as being in cahoots with the Ministry of Lunatics. This was late in the proceedings and led me to think that was what attracted the hacker. But I doubt it. I was annoyed that I didn't record the posts - a chance missed and I won't be making that mistake again. On November 21 Fore Sam did it again. A post with my full name on it. I'm getting sick of this nonsense, but it is in hand. It was about my version of the petition. Only a
true idiot could conclude that my blogging about psychopaths who oppose
curing autism means that I spread hatred and bigotry against autistic
people. WTF? All one has to do is go back through this section, and one will find PLENTY of hate and bigotry against Autistics! Heck - calling us psychopaths isn't hate and/or bigotry? This
Gluyas wacko is so out to lunch that he thinks I hate autistic people
because I'm trying to cure my autistic son. Is there a sane person who can
explain Phil's logic for me? I guess it makes sense to him. It makes sense to truly sane people who actually KNOW the meaning of vilification. The issue of trying (and failing) to cure Sam is beside the point. The blog is infested with hate towards us ASD people. Phil has
found 64 other idiots who agree that I must hate autistic people because
I'm trying to cure one of them. You can visit the petition at the link
below to see who these 64 nitwits are who believe that I am running a hate
site against autistic people. You are, Fore Sam. Again - I've recorded the majority of abuse that you have tossed against us over the last 12 months. And there is plenty of it. Even Joeker saw it before he decided to sit on the fence. And when I get promoting again - that number will increase. It was already up to 67 at the time with more to come. In Phil's
scrambled brain, curing my son violates the blogger terms of service
because I point out the insanity of loopy loons who want to celebrate
having brain damage. I hope Phil is happy that I'm giving his petition
some publicity so he can have my blog deleted. They say that any publicity is good publicity. I don't subscribe to that - given that I've had to delete a few bogus signatures. It means that I have to keep my eyes skinned. What violates the TOS is his attacks on us - calling us "brain damaged" amongst other vilifying commentary. Pointing out "insanity" in the manner that he does is hate speech and bigotry in blazing lights. Someone offered to start a petition against this petition - which would have been a laugh to say the least. No need,
they've had this going on for months and only found 64 lunatics to sign
it. I just thought I'd put it up to help Phil make himself look stupid. I doubt that will be the effect at all! Anyway - this version of the petition has only been active for a month. COMPLETION |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
